Hikki88
@Hikki88@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- Comment on Google admits the open web is in ‘rapid decline’ 3 weeks ago:
You can keep the wool over your eyes and defend your claim blindly. It doesn’t really matter. Unbiased historians will record what happened as it is, at the very least. If you can’t distinguish between invention and distribution, that’s your problem, I suppose.
- Comment on Google admits the open web is in ‘rapid decline’ 1 month ago:
Again, you’re missing the point but I guess that’s okay. Let me lay it out simply: I’m not here to defend anything, I’m just here to state the truth. Everything has positives and negatives, and capitalism is no exception. But the fact remains that it’s the reason we have the internet in the hands of ordinary people. Denying this is simply denying reality.
As for the agricultural revolution example you brought it up, not me. And you have to remember, this isn’t some far-fetched comparison like the agricultural revolution; capitalism has a direct link to the spread of the internet.
But hey, maybe we can just agree to disagree there.
- Comment on Google admits the open web is in ‘rapid decline’ 1 month ago:
Exactly, we can’t know if that’s true or not, but we do know it emerged in reality because of capitalism. That’s all we need to make a case for capitalism, since real-life examples always outweigh imaginary ones.
- Comment on Google admits the open web is in ‘rapid decline’ 1 month ago:
If you said ‘we got the internet thanks to farmers’ that would be indisputable, everything flowed from that.
And why not? Philosophically, a strong argument can be made that the Agricultural Revolution laid the groundwork for everything we know today, including the internet. I don’t see why admitting that would be a problem as it’s simply the truth.
I don’t see why an internet couldn’t emerge in other economic contexts because internet technology depends on physics and those laws transcend any and all economic systems. We already know this because almost every jurisdiction has the internet.
I never disputed that it couldn’t be done, but it’s still a hypothetical. The reality is that capitalists stepped in, and the internet spread like wildfire. Could it be done in other scenarios? Maybe. But pointing out reality shouldn’t be inconvenient.
- Comment on RFK Jr. Blames violent video games for Mass Shootings. 1 month ago:
Reasonable, I think that’s a fair argument. I’m just adding that some abused individuals who use video games as a way to cope with stress might be pushed over the edge when they encounter violence in those games. It may be a small percentage, but it can certainly contribute. But yeah, I have to admit that since it’s not such a tangible thing to grasp, it might be difficult to truly know unless the individual clearly says so.
- Comment on Google admits the open web is in ‘rapid decline’ 1 month ago:
Cool, I think it’s correct and to pretend that it’s otherwise won’t help when you’re in the search for truth. We can agree to disagree.
- Comment on RFK Jr. Blames violent video games for Mass Shootings. 1 month ago:
And what do you think makes people violent? Their upbringing, their environment, their circumstances, and so on. Obviously, if video games are a significant part of their lives, they can contribute to violent tendencies especially if someone cannot distinguish fiction from reality. That’s exactly my point.
- Comment on Google admits the open web is in ‘rapid decline’ 1 month ago:
I’ve made my case, and I never said that. What you do with this information is up to you.
- Comment on RFK Jr. Blames violent video games for Mass Shootings. 1 month ago:
It depends on the individual. Those who cannot distinguish fiction from reality are the ones to watch out for.
- Comment on Google admits the open web is in ‘rapid decline’ 1 month ago:
We all know how it came to be, you didn’t get the point but it’s okay.
- Comment on Google admits the open web is in ‘rapid decline’ 1 month ago:
- Comment on Google admits the open web is in ‘rapid decline’ 1 month ago:
I’m telling you it spread because of government funding and capitalists were just the medium by which the funding was used.
It doesn’t work just by you saying it. According to multiple sources, the government clearly didn’t want to fund commercial internet and largely backed out during the 90s.
The capitalist part is replaceable and unnecessary.
It doesn’t matter if you think it’s replaceable, I can make that claim too. What matters is what actually happened in reality.
- Comment on Google admits the open web is in ‘rapid decline’ 1 month ago:
How am I speculating when my argument is based on reality?
- Comment on Google admits the open web is in ‘rapid decline’ 1 month ago:
And I never said that they invented the internet.
- Comment on Google admits the open web is in ‘rapid decline’ 1 month ago:
- Comment on Google admits the open web is in ‘rapid decline’ 1 month ago:
That doesn’t undermine my argument that it was ultimately because of the capitalists that the internet spread in the first place.
- Comment on Google admits the open web is in ‘rapid decline’ 1 month ago:
That’s not an argument. I don’t need to speculate on hypotheticals when reality already proves the point.
- Comment on Google admits the open web is in ‘rapid decline’ 1 month ago:
It was private at that time. My point is that it spread so quickly to millions of people worldwide because of capitalists—specifically the telecom companies and ISPs—stepping in. Without them, the internet could never have developed on such a scale.
- Comment on Google admits the open web is in ‘rapid decline’ 1 month ago:
You got internet because of capitalists as well.