notquitenothing
@notquitenothing@sh.itjust.works
- Submitted 2 days ago to selfhosted@lemmy.world | 1 comment
- Comment on GitHub - voidauth/voidauth: An Easy to Use and Self-Host Single Sign-On Provider 🐈⬛🔒 3 weeks ago:
Thank you!
- Comment on Authentik vs Authelia? 4 weeks ago:
You can try VoidAuth, it is kinda similar to Authelia+lldap. I am the developer and I created it because I wasn’t satisfied with Authelia’s user management. If you decide you want to try it and run into any issues or questions I will try to help :)
- Comment on How to enhance Caddy's basic_auth? 4 weeks ago:
I don’t think you could do that directly in the Caddyfile, but you can create those groups/policies inside VoidAuth and assign them to users there.
The steps would be to create the ProxyAuth Domain (protected.example.com/*) in VoidAuth with the allowed group(s), make sure the user(s) have that group, then in Caddy add the forward_auth directive to the same route you want to protect.
Then when you go to access that route in a browser it will redirect you to VoidAuth login, or if you pass an Authentication header with Basic Auth (like when using an API) it will use that.
- Comment on How to enhance Caddy's basic_auth? 4 weeks ago:
Developer of VoidAuth here, you could give that a try! If you have any issues or questions I can help :) VoidAuth
- Comment on GitHub - voidauth/voidauth: An Easy to Use and Self-Host Single Sign-On Provider 🐈⬛🔒 1 month ago:
You can do this with VoidAuth as well, by setting the DB_NAME variable
- Comment on GitHub - voidauth/voidauth: An Easy to Use and Self-Host Single Sign-On Provider 🐈⬛🔒 1 month ago:
VoidAuth is simpler to setup/use than Authentik for sure, but of course Authentik has more features. They both support proxy-auth, OIDC, and have user management UIs so in that way they are similar. I like VoidAuth for its simplicity but you can always run both and decide, if you have any questions about setup I will try to answer!
- Comment on GitHub - voidauth/voidauth: An Easy to Use and Self-Host Single Sign-On Provider 🐈⬛🔒 1 month ago:
If you run into any issue during setup let me know! I am still working on the documentation so hopefully it is somewhat understandable 😆
- Comment on GitHub - voidauth/voidauth: An Easy to Use and Self-Host Single Sign-On Provider 🐈⬛🔒 1 month ago:
I will make an issue for adding SQLite support, it has been on my mind for the same reasons. I would say don’t let the Postgres requirement stop you from trying it out. Modern hardware really doesn’t mind having multiple containerized postgresdb instances running, it can be very lightweight when idle.
- Comment on GitHub - voidauth/voidauth: An Easy to Use and Self-Host Single Sign-On Provider 🐈⬛🔒 1 month ago:
I would not recommend using VoidAuth to anyone who needs to be any kind of security compliant. I am not a security professional and am using packages for the OIDC and other security heavy-lifting. I can recommend VoidAuth for those just looking for a simple but good looking auth app for securing their own selfhosted apps and resources.
- Comment on GitHub - voidauth/voidauth: An Easy to Use and Self-Host Single Sign-On Provider 🐈⬛🔒 1 month ago:
I do agree. I have been thinking about adding a SQLite option which should be easy since knex (the database package that VoidAuth uses) supports it. Before releasing that I would want to create some way to migrate your data from one database type to another. If you want to use VoidAuth feel free to make an issue for this!
- Comment on GitHub - voidauth/voidauth: An Easy to Use and Self-Host Single Sign-On Provider 🐈⬛🔒 1 month ago:
Let me know how it goes!
- Comment on GitHub - voidauth/voidauth: An Easy to Use and Self-Host Single Sign-On Provider 🐈⬛🔒 1 month ago:
While I haven’t spun up Keycloak myself, I think VoidAuth would supply some similar functionality. Ideally the features of Keycloak that you are likely to need but easier to setup and use!
- Submitted 1 month ago to selfhosted@lemmy.world | 28 comments