claralistensprechen5th

@claralistensprechen5th@friendica.rogueproject.org

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:
  @Andres4NY @rejinl @ECEC
  I was simply answering the "stupid question" part, so there's that.
• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:
  @rejinl @Andres4NY @ECEC
  ...except they are not. What you're in favor of is no cities. Not gonna happen.
• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:
  @Andres4NY @ECEC
  Cars and trees in the inner city are a combination of problems.
  I did leave one tree problem out: they grow.
  When their roots are surrounded and covered by concrete, the concrete buckles. So do the streets. Unfortunately, city streets are specifically for cars.
• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨[deleted]⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩:

  @ECEC
  Any city manager could tell you everything wrong with having trees downtown.
  * Birds get into them and when they're nesting, they attack anybody walking by
  *Birds also shit on the cars parked under them, and most drivers look for shade to park under
  *Bugs get into them and attract birds when birds aren't nesting
  *Trees drop sap, which also ruins a car's finish
  *city workers have to spend time on the clock keeping the leaves picked up off the ground

  Yeah, the drawback is that the algae don't provide shade.