pineapple
@pineapple@lemmy.ml
- Comment on Still trying to figure it out... 2 weeks ago:
I am in the outdoors a lot as well (in australia) and while snakes aren’t an uncommom sight, I only know one person who has ever been bitten.
- Comment on Still trying to figure it out... 2 weeks ago:
At least you don’t need to worry about a fucking bear or moose charging at you at full speed.
- Comment on Options for remote Wake-on-lan. Or I guess wake on WAN. 5 weeks ago:
thats a good idea, although wifi is not reliable enough for me. Although I found this guide which shows how to add an ethernet port to a PI zero w so hopefully I can use that. Or maybe I should just use a ESP32.
- Comment on 5 weeks ago:
044en17rl is right I meant a public seaxng instance.
- Comment on Options for remote Wake-on-lan. Or I guess wake on WAN. 1 month ago:
That is a lot of money for me, especially if all I need it to do is simulate the on button. Surely there is some really cheap arm based device that has an ethernet port and can therefore send WOL signals.
- Comment on Options for remote Wake-on-lan. Or I guess wake on WAN. 1 month ago:
Arch wiki strikes again! That’s pretty cool I just checked and the bios on my pc does indeed have this feature.
- Comment on New Community Rule: "No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports." 1 month ago:
What?? which ones?
- Comment on Options for remote Wake-on-lan. Or I guess wake on WAN. 1 month ago:
Lan is not the name of my parent 💀
- Comment on 1 month ago:
Using a public instance is more private than using a private selfhosted instance.
- Comment on Options for remote Wake-on-lan. Or I guess wake on WAN. 1 month ago:
That actually seams pretty awsome, just using a really low powered device to send WOL commands.
- Comment on Options for remote Wake-on-lan. Or I guess wake on WAN. 1 month ago:
I don’t have home assistant setup in my parents place, that is a nice feature though I might use that for other things.
- Comment on Options for remote Wake-on-lan. Or I guess wake on WAN. 1 month ago:
I already have 2x2tb hard drives, a singular sd card is not enough for me I need some level of redundancy even for my backups.
- Comment on Options for remote Wake-on-lan. Or I guess wake on WAN. 1 month ago:
I didn’t realise the bios could do that I will look into that.
- Submitted 1 month ago to selfhosted@lemmy.world | 42 comments
- Comment on 1 month ago:
The search engines that searxng interact with still track you. For this reason I will always use a public instance to mix up the tracking with everyone else using it.
- Comment on New Community Rule: "No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports." 1 month ago:
I don’t really take issue with dozens of posts by newbies asking the same basic question over and over. I used to be one and am occasionally back there again if I start a new hobby. Hopefully newcomers don’t get pushed off by overly sensitive moderation.
I’m not sure if I agree with this, unless you need clarification on something specific the forum like nature and search should allow you to find answers to previous questions without asking it again.
But I do agree overmoderation is bad. I swear if communities start implementing a karma system…
- Comment on I keep waffling on Proxmox. Sell me. For or against. 2 months ago:
Oh ok, I’ve never installed debian before so thats good to know.
- Comment on I keep waffling on Proxmox. Sell me. For or against. 2 months ago:
I would have thought debian is better than ubuntu but I couldn’t find a server version of debian. Where do I find debian server or debian cli only?
- Comment on Promised myself I will support them after they go stable. They kept their promise and so did I 2 months ago:
Shhhh! No one can no we are all being played by the immich overlords.
- Comment on I keep waffling on Proxmox. Sell me. For or against. 2 months ago:
Is it decently easy to create and manage vm’s and containers with the terminal? I use proxmox at the moment. Should I switch to Ubuntu server?
- Comment on Important Notice of Security Incident 4 months ago:
Same here.
- Comment on Expert here. 5 months ago:
Why is there a photo of a stick?
- Comment on Apart, low in cholesterine 5 months ago:
I get it.
- Comment on Budget small (ish) case for a nas. 5 months ago:
Yes the node 804 is exactly what I’m looking for! It’s a bit outdated in terms of looks but I don’t really mind that much for a home server. Aside from that it seams pretty much perfect.
- Submitted 5 months ago to selfhosted@lemmy.world | 9 comments
- Comment on The Future is NOT Self-Hosted 5 months ago:
This is really cool. And I would say a good replacement for current cloud setups. Since it’s unreasonable to expect everyone to self-host. Although I think this could only really be a cost saving measure since there are already services like protondrive that offer end 2 end encryption. And I would probably trust the reliability of proton drive over the community hosting my stuff.
- Comment on Home server advice 5 months ago:
Generally intel has the best idle power consumption although amd won’t be terrible either. unless you already have an amd motherboard or cpu lying around I would recommend grabbing a 11th gen i5.
If you want to reduce your power idle power consumption undervolting won’t help you there, it will only reduce power consumption while under load. Generally the biggest killer for idle power consumption is actually your motherboard and for that reason try to find a smaller motherboard. Mini-itx is best but you’ll probably find that micro-atx is a lot cheaper while not sacrificing too much power draw.
I can’t say how useful your gtx 960 will be, I’d test it to see if it can encode/decode/transcode video fast enough for your needs. If it is fast enough then you can easily get away with an 8th/9th gen intel cpu you’ll find they are a lot cheaper, you could get an even older cpu as per Jellyfins hardware requirements but you’ll sacrifice some power consumption and probably not save that much money. 8th/9th gen CPU’s have pretty good power idle power consumption which is of course what should be targeted here.
- Comment on Tape drive backups 5 months ago:
Ook, maybe if I ever need to store a petabyte or two for whatever reason.
- Comment on Tape drive backups 5 months ago:
How have I never heard of tape drives for backup before? They seam like the ultimate medium for archival storage. Super cheap although very slow, sounds like a good compromise to me.
- Comment on Answering your Homelab Questions! 6 months ago:
Great video. Made me reconsider using mergerfs and snapraid instead of zfs. invidious link.