kingofras
@kingofras@lemmy.world
- Comment on US | Hegseth fires general whose agency's intel assessment of damage from Iran strikes angered Trump 2 days ago:
I never imagined seeing South Park as a legitimate news source, but every day it seems like they’re right. He actually has a micropenis.
- Comment on Family Values 2 days ago:
After more conversations with his daughter he now travels to the Kremlin twice a week to help Putin have his **** ******.
- Submitted 2 days ago to newcommunities@lemmy.world | 0 comments
- Comment on Kate Chaney: By increasing the GST to 15%, we could make the tax system fairer for younger Australians 5 days ago:
Jordies is not on board either
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gu19s6dmwA0
Quick diagram for those new to politics.
Generating disproportionate levels of money comes from destroying nature.
Politics needs lots of money.
Politicians continually struggle to do anything to protect nature.
- Comment on Stripes! 🐅 1 week ago:
I don’t like to talk about it
- Comment on Should large Fediverse instances and Bluesky encourage, not require, users to opt-in to bridges that connect to Bluesky and other non-fedi social web platforms? 1 week ago:
This person codes
- Submitted 2 weeks ago to aboringdystopia@lemmy.world | 6 comments
- Comment on Stripes! 🐅 2 weeks ago:
Cool fact. Next time I get mauled by one I’ll just taunt them by calling them hairy zebras!
- Comment on Larry Ellison predicts rise of the modern surveillance state where ‘citizens will be on their best behavior’ 2 weeks ago:
On the 17th of September last year?
- Comment on Larry Ellison predicts rise of the modern surveillance state where ‘citizens will be on their best behavior’ 2 weeks ago:
What a coinkidink!
I just predicted this morning that the way things are going his and his billionaire friend’s heads will be on pikes before the end of the decade
It will be declared an international monument that will be visited by schools for decades to come to learn about the importance of regular class wars to keep the parasites in check in a society.
- Comment on NSFW on Lemmy 2 weeks ago:
I’m a bit baffled at hom many people are misunderstanding my post.
This is not instance related. This is just an additional NSFW type of filter. Please reread the OP or my other comments.
- Comment on NSFW on Lemmy 2 weeks ago:
Thanks for duding me
You have not read or don’t understand the OP. This is about communities like my example in the OP, which many would not consider NSFW, but is on the touchy side of a bunch of other people. The communities don’t want the NSFW tag, but the users who want the ability to filter out the soft NSFW stuff.
- Comment on NSFW on Lemmy 2 weeks ago:
Mate no. the UK ban did not originate from a federated open source community implementing filter systems.
Stop spreading absolute panic bullshit like this.
I would say, show me historic proof, but I doubt you’re that type of person.
- Comment on NSFW on Lemmy 2 weeks ago:
Ok, I hear you. But as I said, it’s just adding filter options to those snowflakes like me, while not changing a single pixel for those like yourself.
Allowing superior UX for more people is how you make the internet better.
Nobody is advocating for a ban, nor can or will this be used as a first step towards one.
- Comment on NSFW on Lemmy 2 weeks ago:
Argument 1: nobody else has it so why should we? Because we are new, the next step - we improve what needs to be done better.
Argument 2: reddit is full of porn… see above. We can make it better, at very little cost to anyone.
Argument 3 is undermining your first 2, but I agree. This would cause a few instances to become very popular and render the concept of federation unnecessary.
I don’t understand how a bunch of people here are basically say /all is a sewer, accept it.
I’m say it is not and doesn’t have to be. It is a place for discovery, and there is a way to make that more pleasant. Another commenter said an AI filter would also be good.
All I am suggesting is In addition to having the Fediverse allowing posts and communities to be marked NSFW, to allow for more filters. One filter like what I am suggesting could be a snowflake or FamFriendly filter which removes suggestive, soft porn or racy or soft gore stuff. Another could be AI which removes synthetically generated content.
How anyone can be against that is beyond me. I’m not asking for these things to be turned on by default, or to shove it down people’s throats. By default /all would still be the same
I understand NSFW and FamilyFriendly are blurry concepts. It is still up to the post OPs, community creators, moderators and instance administrators to use these properly.
- Comment on NSFW on Lemmy 2 weeks ago:
?
How does this… Did you…
- Comment on NSFW on Lemmy 2 weeks ago:
I’ve responded to the top comment to address the flaws in that argument.
- Comment on NSFW on Lemmy 2 weeks ago:
I’ve responded to the top comment to address the flaws in that argument.
- Comment on NSFW on Lemmy 2 weeks ago:
I’ve responded to the top comment to address the flaws in that argument.
- Comment on NSFW on Lemmy 2 weeks ago:
I thought this community is for discussions about the Fediverse and not limited to any particular instance.
- Comment on NSFW on Lemmy 2 weeks ago:
Why am I not surprised that the most sensible response comes from one of the more awesome mods on this platform
o7 sir, thanks for acknowledging my point and chiming in.
- Comment on NSFW on Lemmy 2 weeks ago:
You’ll find that admin == mod == post OP in a lot of these cases
- Comment on NSFW on Lemmy 2 weeks ago:
No that’s not my taste in content. That’s me trying to get this reddit alternative to gain traction. And it’s not going to do that by being an echo chamber. If you have kids, you want parental controls so they don’t have to see certain content. If you’re at work, you want be able to prevent suggestive drawings to hit your screen, or on public transport.
Your response act as if I’m asking for a ban. I’m asking for an ability for the user to control it. Leave it off by default for all I care (which is what the current NSFW setting does).
/all may not be the first impressing, but it is where the majority of new user will go due to their instance not necessarily having that much content.
- Comment on NSFW on Lemmy 2 weeks ago:
This is a recurring response, so forgive me for hijacking your comment to write this again.
/all is where we make our first impression to the world. For a lot of people /all is where (on a still growing platform) people go to discover. I don’t think having an additional “soft NSFW” filter would be a bad thing.
There’s a reason most clients have an NSFW filter in their settings.
- Comment on NSFW on Lemmy 2 weeks ago:
I’m not trying to conform the world to my taste. Porn like stuff makes the platform less appealing in general.
All is where we make our first impression to the world. All is where (on a still growing platform) people go to discover. I don’t think having an additional “soft NSFW” filter would be a bad thing.
There’s a reason most clients have an NSFW filter in their settings.
- Comment on NSFW on Lemmy 2 weeks ago:
I meant my request to mark the community as NSFW is being downvoted, which I understand.
I downvote the post only if the mod just removes my request, which I think is mod abuse.
- Comment on NSFW on Lemmy 2 weeks ago:
I presume you don’t have alts then!
- Comment on NSFW on Lemmy 2 weeks ago:
Thanks that’s awesome.
- Comment on NSFW on Lemmy 2 weeks ago:
I’ll block them individually, but I would love for there to be a tagging or classification system. Perhaps even a ‘Snowflake NSFW’ setting that allows people to filter out anything suggestive. I understand those hentai communities don’t want to be penalised by having an outRight NSFW tag on them either.
- Submitted 2 weeks ago to fediverse@lemmy.world | 146 comments
