Ediacarium
@Ediacarium@feddit.org
- Comment on Dress smartly even when sleeping 4 days ago:
People who died in the shower:
- Comment on Video game romances need to evolve beyond lore dumps 1 week ago:
Oh, I do think that romance is logical. After all its purpose is to ensure the survival of the genes. It’s just that the romance algorithms and the hardware they’re running on have been hotfixed for millions of years so there are insane amounts of technical debt, that make the algorithm hard to figure out.
And in romance movies there is always a pursuer and a pursued party. And, as audience, we can clearly identify the correct behavior for the pursuer. But, if you identify with the pursued party, then these romance movies will feel like it’s all chance, because the pursued often has very little agency.
A scoring system just formalizes this behaviour. And in video games, you as a main character have all the in-game agency. A romance, that would move the agency to an NPC will feel like the “OMG it’s you, the grand champion” guy from Oblivion, or like a courier desperately trying to talk to you no matter where you are.
And I generally don’t have an issue with local LLMs in video games, but I really don’t think there is a way to make them work. Dialog trees are a really good way to give a player some control, while not overwhelming them with choice. They might work best for allowing characters to acknowledge things you have done outside their own little storylines.
And, sure, I can type in my question. But this will be clunky and imo break the flow of the game. And I really don’t want to sit infront of a computer and be talking out loud to some NPCs.
- Comment on Video game romances need to evolve beyond lore dumps 1 week ago:
This is a really weird way to argue a weird point. I think, the main issue is, most games are closer to boardgames than movies and the author places them too close to movies.
And you can build boardgames for romance, sure. But, unless the romance is part of the core game loop, it’s something that breaks the flow of the game. So it gets abstracted away, or the romance is expressed in terms of the core game mechanics. Which, in video games often are reaching the next scene, dialog trees or gaining stat points.
And, even if you think they’re closer to movies, then most video games are closest to action movies. And here the word romance isn’t used. It’s just renamed love interest and is often just the price for saving the world, but the core ‘mechanics’ are the same.
And most romances will start as fun flings full of hope, not with the nitty-gritty logistics. The logistics will come later, sure. But most Video-Games are set romantically in a few weeks of summer camp, so there is no need to figure out logistics, yet.
Open-World games, that have a character that travels around and meets people as part of their daily lives, sure.
But this argument would apply to games like the Elder Scrolls series. Not Cyberpunk 2077 in which the main character is dying and has only weeks left to live.
But, I do concede that most romances do fall flat once you’ve reached the top. You had your sex-scene and you may have your kisses, your hugs, the new greetings in dialogue, and the characters return to being cardboard in the background.
- Comment on You can ask any question to the people of year 3000, but can only receive information in the form of a single bit. What's your question? 2 weeks ago:
If you’re not asking about anything that we currently don’t have a word for, we can use words as the alphabet, sure.
We then need to transmit a list of words, they’re allowed to use, otherwise our count is off, because I’m sure that 974 years from now english won’t be the same, as it is today. They’ll have a lot more skibid rizz than we do now.
- Comment on You can ask any question to the people of year 3000, but can only receive information in the form of a single bit. What's your question? 2 weeks ago:
- Comment on You can ask any question to the people of year 3000, but can only receive information in the form of a single bit. What's your question? 2 weeks ago:
Once you’re able to use time as an information, they can send a message with a character limit. For every letter they need to wait:
Remaining Message Length^Alphabet Size*Index of Letter*time intervalSo, if future people want to sent the message
helloand our time unit is 1s, and the max message length is 5, they need to send the bit to exactly26^4*7+26^3*4+26^2*11+26^1*11+26^0*14=3276872seconds or54614,5333minor910,242222hor ~38 days after the start time.We can choose smaller time intervals, but with a long enough message, we’ll eventually reach the year 3000 again. Alternatively, we can move the start time into the past, at the expense of quite a few possible messages.
This is effectively the same problem as trying to map an n-dimensional array to a one dimensional array.
- Comment on My morning routine in 2026 5 weeks ago:
Depends:
Are we talking multiple fucks, or one continuous, long one?
- Comment on Drink some water. NOW!!! 1 month ago:
They know where you are at all times. They know this because they know where you aren’t.
- Comment on The Internet is for.. 2 months ago:
- Comment on A challenge she is willing to accept 2 months ago:
Why is she trying to strangle someone in a romance novel?
- Comment on There are ultimately only so many damn angles, okay!? 2 months ago:
Maybe something like this? Image
- Comment on Try it. It works 2 months ago:
Hate it when I get an ad break during my team meetings
- Comment on You finally woke up! 4 months ago:
You are in the House of Elrond, but we do not grant you the rank of master
- Comment on Share them all! 5 months ago:
Only if you have at least one non-selfie meme on your phone
- Comment on generation 5 months ago:
No way, my best friend also overdosed on feet :(
- Comment on ‘Stop Killing Games’: Demands for game ownership must also include workers’ rights 6 months ago:
No :)
I agree, that workers’ rights are an important topic, but adding more scope, won’t do either goal any good. - Comment on Ready for dinner 8 months ago:
Chess pizza
- Comment on Teens Are Using ChatGPT to Invest in the Stock Market 9 months ago:
Scam a senior like everybody else?
- Comment on *Doesn't look like anything to me.* 9 months ago:
These violent delights have violent ends
- Comment on [deleted] 10 months ago:
Or maybe just play a laugh track right after they finished?
- Comment on [deleted] 10 months ago:
Agreed, the AI doesn’t even respond in first person.