Gorillazrule

@Gorillazrule@lemmy.dbzer0.com

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨BACK IT UP⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  If the brain worms tell RFK Jr. That psychedelics are actually a cancer cure, then legislation could be put forth to legalize psychedelics. But rather than allowing recreational use, or using them for a medical purpose based on scientific fact such as use in conjunction with therapy to treat depression, it could be legalized as prescribed medication for cancer. This has the drawbacks of not allowing access to people that could actually benefit from it, as well as now being used as a snake oil cure for something completely unrelated that will prevent people from getting other more effective treatment.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨BACK IT UP⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  I think the implications here is that the reasons it gets legalized can have an impact on the specifics of the policy. Which would mean that they wouldn’t agree with the policy beyond the legalization itself.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data’⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  This is such a nothing argument. If all you’re talking about is a summary of a book, people have been able to get that long before AI. I can go to a wikipedia entry right now of any book and look at a plot summary. The author does not get paid for me looking at the summary on Wikipedia. There are numerous other sites where you can find summaries of books. And if you’re asking an AI for a summary of a specific book by a specific author, what attribution would you like to see? The user already knows the source because they’re specifically asking for a summary of that source.

  A bigger concern would be the AI reproducing your works and using them in responses.