Sgagvefey

@Sgagvefey@lemmynsfw.com

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨AI's Future Hangs in the Balance With California Law⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  For anything where you would ever expect a predictable, useful outcome to an arbitrary input. There is no possible path to LLMs ever doing anything close to that.

  LLMs aren’t driving cars. LLMs aren’t doing financial modeling. Those are entirely different tools with heavily hand crafted models to specific applications.

  Anyone using an LLM to provide therapy should get multiple life sentences in prison regardless of outcomes. There is no possible way to LLMs ever being actually useful for therapy. It’s just a random text generator that’s tuned well enough to sound good. It has no substance and the underlying tech cannot possibly develop substance.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨AI's Future Hangs in the Balance With California Law⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  It’s only an “open question” if you are somehow confused by the fact that it’s a super simple algorithm that cannot ever possibly be used like that.

  It may be a small part of a proper architecture for a functional solution, but there’s no possibility that it will ever be doing the heavy lifting. It is what it is, and that’s an obvious dead end.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨AI's Future Hangs in the Balance With California Law⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  There are plenty of nondeterministic algorithms. It’s not a special trait. There are plenty of algorithms with actual emergent behavior, which LLMs don’t have to any meaningful extent. We absolutely understand how LLMs work

  The answer to both of your questions is not some unsolved mystery. It’s “of course not”. That’s not what they do and fundamentally requires a much more complex architecture to even approach.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨AI's Future Hangs in the Balance With California Law⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  It’s regulatory capture. Add deluded barriers to entry to make it difficult for competition and community projects to develop, and you have a monopoly.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨AI's Future Hangs in the Balance With California Law⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  We do fully understand them. Not knowing the exact model they come to doesn’t mean the algorithm has a shred of mystery involved.

  It’s autocomplete with a really big training set and a really big model. It cannot possibly develop agency. It’s hundreds of orders of magnitude of complexity short of a human.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨AI's Future Hangs in the Balance With California Law⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Zero of these things are impacted by this legislation in any way.

  This is exclusively the mentally unstable “killer AI” nonsense. We’re not even 1% of 1% of the way to anything resembling agency.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨AI's Future Hangs in the Balance With California Law⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Though it sounds extreme, there are a lot of smart people in the AI community who truly believe AI could end humanity.

  No. There are not.

  Believing anything resembling current tools has the capacity to end humanity in incontrovertible proof that you are not smart.