Fortyseven
@Fortyseven@startrek.website
- Comment on Film Discussion | Star Trek: Section 31 1 week ago:
The music seemed to suggest she was some big character reveal, but instead I think they were just excited that they got Curtis to film something from her bathroom via Cameo for $50 so they could have her in the movie.
- Comment on Film Discussion | Star Trek: Section 31 1 week ago:
Despite my negative reaction to the trailer, and hearing all the early spoiler-free reviews validating that reaction, I went into it hoping for a guilty pleasure of some kind, where I can go “yeah that wasn’t great, but I kinda liked it”.
Not so much. (I wrote up a full thing over here. Spoiler: it’s a 1 out of 5 for me.)
But here’s some positives, since this group contains perhaps the most generous comments I’ve ever seen about it so far:
-
I think the cast was decent; the guy playing Quasi especially stood out to me. Liked their casting for Rachel Garrett, and the bit of personality they gave her; it doesn’t stomp on her TNG appearance, just adds to it. And she kinda looks like her if you squint.
-
The core concept is fine, and with a huge overhaul they could have had something here. Yet by the end of this thing, I could almost see this going forward with more episodes. Few shows hit the ground running before finding the right balance. Unfortunately this will never get that chance.
-
The sets and VFX are quite good for a streaming series at times.
-
The angry face on the Deltan before she left was amazing? (I’m really struggling here.)
-
- Comment on Watch: Michelle Yeoh Brings ‘Section 31’ Clip To Colbert, Talks Love Of Star Trek 1 week ago:
Probably should have made some Star Trek then. 😏
- Comment on How Star Trek: Lower Decks Managed To Get Enterprise’s Jolene Blalock To Appear, And Why She’s Only Credited By Her First Name 4 weeks ago:
Admittedly I’m skeptical of it, but finding out Robert Picardo is involved makes my ears perk up.
- Comment on Interview: ‘Star Trek: Section 31’ Cast Opens Up About Their Characters, Backstories, And More 2 months ago:
Curiosity rising. Just a little. But it’s something. ;)
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
That works, too. (And probably closer to what I was thinking, honestly.)
- Comment on [deleted] 2 months ago:
There’s room for it, under the right conditions, but… this feels completely wrong in almost every direction. Section 31, as a collective group, should not feel like a bad rip off of Guardians of the Galaxy. Absolutely the wrong tone.
I will give it a fair shot, however, since it won’t cost me anything but my time. :P
- Comment on Untold Story Of Emperor Georgiou To Be Told In ‘Star Trek: Section 31’ Comic Book Tie-In 2 months ago:
I really, really, really hope this ends up being like Lower Decks where I was very skeptical of it going in, but ended up loving it.
Because everything about this is actively repelling me.
- Comment on Interview: Jonathan Del Arco Talks “Borg Spin-Off” That Became ‘Star Trek: Picard’ And Hugh’s Surprise Death 4 months ago:
Ugh. Another sour bit of Picard trivia for the pile. Del Arco comes across as a decent fellow. I remember spending all season wondering where the hell this was all going and hoping his character’s death – in the full context – would make more narrative sense. How blissfully naive I was. :P
It’s crazy that the show I was most hyped for ended up being the one I’d erase from the timeline if I could. Visually gorgeous, with a great cast… but, IMHO, it was far too ‘grimdark’ for it’s own good. That and it’s shattershot kitchen-sink approach to storytelling makes it all feel like some fan fiction wet dream in retrospect. Anything positive I could take away from the series is almost completely lost in the noise.
(Keeping in mind that I keep S1/S2 distinct from S3, which while an improvement, has it’s own things going on. 😏)
- Comment on "I'll say this for him, he's consistent." 4 months ago:
“Dr. Vance… are you wearing makeup…?” (Oops, wrong movie.)