BeeDemocracy
@BeeDemocracy@sh.itjust.works
- Comment on Assange: guilty of journalism 4 months ago:
While we’re at it, free Dan Duggan, imprisoned on behalf of the US with no local charges, awaiting extradition accused of something that isn’t even a crime here.
- Comment on Julian Assange reunites with family as he arrives in Canberra 4 months ago:
I have to correct you there. The full unredacted cables are still online on various sites. Including cryptome. They have been online this entire time. Yes, no-one was harmed, but not because they put the cat back in the bag (you can’t). Once other sites had published it, WikiLeaks republished the full trove as a risk-mitigation measure so that the compromised names could quickly make themselves aware that their name was out there. WL also contacted the State Department to try and warn them of the risk. There is footage of this.
The US spent tons of money trying to find anyone who’d been harmed by Manning’s leaks but found no-one.
WikiLeaks had been drip-feeding big stories based on the cables. The compromise of the encryption key to the full unredacted archive by Luke Harding and David Leigh of the Guardian put a stop to this unfortunately.
- Comment on Assange: guilty of journalism 4 months ago:
Thank you. This made my day! 😂😂😂
- Comment on Julian Assange flies out of UK after release from prison: WikiLeaks | ABC News 4 months ago:
RT was one of many broadcasters the show was licensed to. Including Youtube.
It was produded independently.
- Comment on Julian Assange flies out of UK after release from prison: WikiLeaks | ABC News 4 months ago:
Wikipedia is not proof. The sources it links, CNN and Reuters, are not proof.
Calling me names doesn’t make you right.
- Comment on Julian Assange flies out of UK after release from prison: WikiLeaks | ABC News 4 months ago:
Actually, he’s always denied having worked with Russia, and I’m sure there’s no proof for it, so you’ll have to come up with something better than that.
- Submitted 4 months ago to australia@aussie.zone | 3 comments
- Comment on If you're seeing this, I'm in jail. 5 months ago:
This is the best explanation of the case in full context I’ve seen.
- Comment on If you're seeing this, I'm in jail. 5 months ago:
I’m gutted. Devastated.
- Comment on If you're seeing this, I'm in jail. 5 months ago:
The abc is not biased at all in this, no. They’re not the ones he leaked to.
You make it sound like he accidentally leaked evidence of war crimes. He leaked evidence of war crimes comitted by generals as well as boots on the ground but somehow the abc’s top ‘investigative reporters’ ie gov’t stenographers are still missing that.
- Submitted 6 months ago to australia@aussie.zone | 3 comments
- Comment on David McBride vs Goliath: chapter infinity minus 5000: sentencing. Come to Canberra Supreme Court May 14, 8am rally. #operation500 6 months ago:
100%, it’s total BS! Kafka coulnot have come up with this farce.
Remember how in November the court ruled on the definition of ‘duty’? Michael West reports that if McBride gets a prison sentence on Tuesday, there will likely be an appeal:
If there is a custodial sentence, sources told MWM the defence is likely to appeal on grounds that Justice Mossop’s decision to strike out of McBride’s public interest defence was too narrow, that army lawyers had a duty to the court and the public interest, not just to obey orders if they considered the orders were wrong.
- Comment on David McBride vs Goliath: chapter infinity minus 5000: sentencing. Come to Canberra Supreme Court May 14, 8am rally. #operation500 6 months ago:
video
Military whistleblower David McBride at the end of an exhausting day in court. Sentencing adjourned to Tues 14th May, 9.30am. Please be there!
- David McBride vs Goliath: chapter infinity minus 5000: sentencing. Come to Canberra Supreme Court May 14, 8am rally. #operation500sh.itjust.works ↗Submitted 6 months ago to australia@aussie.zone | 3 comments
- Comment on David McBride vs Goliath in a nutshell 6 months ago:
That’s certainly a big part of it.
- Comment on David McBride vs Goliath in a nutshell 6 months ago:
Thanks!
- Comment on David McBride vs Goliath in a nutshell 6 months ago:
What I don’t understand is how the case wasn’t thrown out by the judge when he wasn’t allowed to see the docs that were then put in the safe. THIS IS NOT A FAIR TRIAL. The defendent is prevented from presenting potentially exculpatory evidence, even to a closed court!
- Submitted 6 months ago to australia@aussie.zone | 9 comments
