kwomp2

@kwomp2@sh.itjust.works

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Academic papers yanked after authors found to have used unlicensed software⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩:

  I wonder what those people claim they keep politics and science seperated. You know, because if you get a lab coat you’re immune

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨The mark⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  Nah but a fresh tick bite. This means I’m from the future

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨The stats don't lie⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Someone discovered the dialectic of individual and society

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨I miss console ads being this weird⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  I was gonna add “these days” but didn’t

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨I miss console ads being this weird⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Looks more like a few hours of cramping body and soul followed by 3 days of emotional hangover

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Elsevier⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Thank you, this justifies to introduce myself as campaign porn producer from now on

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Elsevier⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  (What I’m trying to say is you have my bow)

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Elsevier⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Succesfully iniating this from the fediverse would be such a massive boost in public visibility and discoursive strength of the project of collectivization of information infrastructure (like lemmy).

  Imagine we fluffin freed science from capital and basically all the scientists openly stated how useful this was

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Fossils⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Okay I dont know much about dino categorization, but let’s say: The category “dinosaur” is a sum of descriptions of objective properties of dinosaurs and their relation to other species’ properties (idk, no milk, thus no mammal…). Those properties and relations existed as the dinosaur existed. So I would agree: to that extend the categories existed, without us.

  Let’s say the category “poetry” describes a relational phenomenon that occurs when a combination of words or an arrangement of things (sunset, fossils) sparks an aesthetic experience.

  This is not just discovered and described by humans, but it can exclusively happen when humans are present. As with dinos: the category “poetry” didn’ exist before us. The difference I’m all about: What the category describes also did’t exist before humans. Yes, there were fossils, but they alone would have never evolved to be a part of poetry without humans, the way dinos were dinos without humans.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Community⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  You also rock.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Community⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  You rock.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Fossils⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  To the haters: I dont question your experience of (this) poetry. That I would be sorry for.

  I questions the hypostasis, that is declaring your experience of the thing as a property of the thing.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Fossils⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  No. By my logic human existence is the point in wich poetry exists.

  Yes, we almost agree, I just argue: Poetry is not what sparks. It’s the spark.

  Sunrise exists: no poetry. Sunrise sparks someones mind: poetry.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Community⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Did anyone look this up?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Fossils⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Yeah nice, but also no not quite… Before humans and before words there was no poetry. Just stones and bugs and stuff. It needed humans cognitive capacity to emerge/create (not discover) aesthetic categories, like poetry

  Sorry for fact checking your poetic meme, but it made this claim that might be understood factual and unreflected mystification of nature is still quite a thing

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Israel reports minor damage to military base after ‘limited number’ of Iran missiles fall on its territory – live⁩ ⁨⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Same answer, see the post I’m referring to

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Israel reports minor damage to military base after ‘limited number’ of Iran missiles fall on its territory – live⁩ ⁨⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  I picked up that theme in the post I’m referring to. It fits the western narrative of potency

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Israel reports minor damage to military base after ‘limited number’ of Iran missiles fall on its territory – live⁩ ⁨⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Iran: oppressing women, religion, wasting ressources, limp dick

  USA: praising women, rational thought, outperforming, big potent dick

  To me this looks like binary construction of reality, wich helps to avoid critique of your own society by externalizing it on the outside. Just an idea, but this might be interesting to consider: How is the US doing on “praising women” lately? How about bad decisions being justified with religion? Directing ressources? (Distribution of wealth)

  And does the Penis metaphor actually help you to find an adequate critical stance to politics and your society?

  Will this way of going about critique/understanding of our societies help us?

  Maybe, does it help the permaboner, christian, antifeminist, billionairfriendly “performers”?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨ripperonis⁩ ⁨⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Wasn’t sure if you were joking. But after 3 minutes of research I see you weren’t. Thanks for that info. … turns out they don’t euphemize their euthanize.

  I’ll see myself out

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Social media⁩ ⁨⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Random wrong place I know, but dont wanna bother more people then necessary: Why cant i see upvotes/downvotes?