Carrick1973

@Carrick1973@lemmy.world

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Proton is transitioning towards a non-profit structure | Proton⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  I agree. I actually think it’s a net negative as well for friendships. As in the case of OP, I would rather get an original email from the sender saying they couldn’t make it, so let’s meet the next day, but instead I have to read thru several paragraphs of boilerplate and AI crap instead, which wastes my time, and I know the sender did it, so I’m mad at them for being impersonal. At some point, we’re just going to have people’s AI responding to each other without any person actually reading it.

  We’re only doing this because every company doesn’t want to be left behind so they go all in. It feels like Ian Malcolm said it best in Jurassic Park

  “Yeah, yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn’t stop to think if they should”

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Rivian CEO RJ Scaringe says too many carmakers are copying Tesla⁩ ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Any new automobile manufacturer has to do that initially in order to make enough money to get the manufacturing and supply chain developed enough to create a car for the masses. They start with a lower volume and higher priced car to get the excitement for the product. Once they have that, they are able to start assembling a larger volume at a lower price.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Major ChatGPT-4o update allows audio-video talks with an “emotional” AI chatbot⁩ ⁨⁨6⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  I really hate it. In fact, it’s hard to listen to because it’s been built to reply in such a sycophant way. Everything is enthusiastic and positive when that’s not how real life is. I’m paraphrasing obviously, but it’s like “OMG you’re wearing a leather jacket and a light colored shirt, you’re so cool!” and “You’re in an industrial place with lighting, that’s so awesome!”

  I’d rather they work on code that optimizes the validity of the results and prevents hallucinations rather than work on emotive responses.