ZahzenEclipse
@ZahzenEclipse@kbin.social
- Comment on [deleted] 11 months ago:
Anything that broke the "echochamber" is what got downvoted but this was never strictly about downvoting it was about moderation so im not sure why you shifted the focus to downvotes. We know you're trying to essentially say the people who got downvoted or moderated deserved it because they said things so "bad" they deserved to be moderated. I'm not sure that's always true or even mostly true.
You're right that free speech typically means the ability to speak freely without government intervention but I think you're being obtuse if you don't see how those implications could be limited by corporations online and if you're comfortable with censorship online not being democratically decided upon that's cool but I don't trust the corporations as much as you do i guess.
- Comment on [deleted] 11 months ago:
You need free speech to ensure teachers don't get fired for teaching science. I'd be care about removing that ability from other roles and people just because you disagree with the premise.
- Comment on [deleted] 11 months ago:
In that sense, at least they are transparent a put being authoritarian. There are too many "populist left" spaces where those things aren't spelled out and you'll be banned for a vague rule that could be anything and everything. I despise when they don't give transparency to their rules and how they enforce them. It's generally bad too imo. That being said, mods have a hard fucking job admittedly and they aren't paid.
- Comment on [deleted] 11 months ago:
Are you in favor of firing teachers who day things that go against common popular teachings in an area?
Your mocking of this situation makes me feel you'd be in favor of laws that fire teachers for teaching evolution for example.
- Comment on [deleted] 11 months ago:
Thats not a very good argument at all. You're literally stating "well since majority agrees with it, it must mean somethings wrong with you." How could possibly think this is healthy or goodm
- Comment on [deleted] 11 months ago:
I wasn't trolling at all. I'm not sure how that could be your take away with the information I gave. I guess you're in favor of moderation that limits discussion and opposing viewpoints. Most authoritarian are though so I can't be suprised.
- Comment on [deleted] 11 months ago:
I think its mistake to simply play these folks off as people who want to say racial slurs or something.
- Comment on [deleted] 11 months ago:
There's ways to "not follow the hive mind" without getting banned. There's a reason why daily wire is able to be on YouTube and reddit for example.
- Comment on [deleted] 11 months ago:
My reddit account was recently perm banned for messaging a mod who banned me from a sub for mockingly repeating their policy back to them on attribution and OC. Granted, I was perma banned for "harrassment". I am skeptical of the people you are talking about but I think its a mistake to dismiss all these guys as people who just want to say racial slurs or something.
- Comment on NVIDIA CEO Huang urges faster AI development—to make it safer 11 months ago:
Which one would you suggest to review?
- Comment on Sam Altman wins power struggle, returns to OpenAI with new board 11 months ago:
As a newer developer is has been amazing for me and alot of experienced developers also recognize how much benefit it provides so im honestly confused by your standpoint.
- Comment on Sam Altman wins power struggle, returns to OpenAI with new board 11 months ago:
If you're not actively using AI for a tech job then you're leaving yourself behind. It's look ignoring using Google.
- Comment on Sam Altman wins power struggle, returns to OpenAI with new board 11 months ago:
Yeah I don't know if the board getting ousted is good for anyone but open ai
- Comment on Sam Altman wins power struggle, returns to OpenAI with new board 11 months ago:
The whole purpose of the board is to provide a safety valve. If the CEO is hiding stuff from the board then that seems like a completely legitimate reason to throw out a CEO. It's hard to be a safety valve when the CEO is actively hiding information from the board to make the decisions they need to make.
- Comment on NVIDIA CEO Huang urges faster AI development—to make it safer 11 months ago:
Social media will always devolve into that. I like seeing arguments personally but when it devolves into name calling and ego stroking it gets annoying real quick
- Comment on NVIDIA CEO Huang urges faster AI development—to make it safer 11 months ago:
They didn't say anything xenophobic. They may have benefits ageist but it was after you tried to play "I've been doing since you were born" card, and that makes it fair game. You were being unnecessarily aggressive from the start of this exchange and I think they were matching your energy. If you want an outside perspective but you may lash out at me too.
- Comment on NVIDIA CEO Huang urges faster AI development—to make it safer 11 months ago:
You're suck a dick for no reason. It definitely bolsters your claims your an old school tech guy lol
- Comment on NVIDIA CEO Huang urges faster AI development—to make it safer 11 months ago:
Is this speculation or do you have proof they are giving products away to inflate a bubble?
- Comment on Scientists Create Gene-Hacked Monkey That Glowed Green 11 months ago:
They can't live for very long. It's why I kinda think this work is so ewhat unethical - even if it brings about breakthroughs that could help millions.