tetranomos
@tetranomos@awful.systems
i consent not (just) to be a single-being
surf lemmy.world/u/epigone
- Submitted 4 months ago to aboringdystopia@lemmy.world | 0 comments
- Comment on Helmut Newton | Nastassia Kinski for Playboy (1983) | Available for Sale | Artsy 4 months ago:
for the question “will artsy dot net have to start taking age verification?” to pass nimby codes
- Comment on Helmut Newton | Nastassia Kinski for Playboy (1983) | Available for Sale | Artsy 4 months ago:
for context: dutchreview.com/…/decolonising-dutch-museums/
- Submitted 4 months ago to aboringdystopia@lemmy.world | 5 comments
- Artificial Intelligence and Its Implications for Future Suffering – Center on Long-Term Risklongtermrisk.org ↗Submitted 4 months ago to aboringdystopia@lemmy.world | 0 comments
- Comment on Did it hurt? 5 months ago:
algorithms of oppression. noble.
- Comment on How the Simulation Argument Dampens Future Fanaticism – Center on Long-Term Risk 11 months ago:
let’s get you up-to-date in the 21st century. back in 2001 margaret runchey prototyped her unitary technology in “model of everything”, some patented stuff happening about ontological design just before jeff bezos’ “api mandate” (2002). now we’re assessing how to model transaction artifacts that [learn] or [fail not to learn] about their own copies or clones which “own people as data”.
so, that’s copies of people [theorized as data objects or entities] depending on your philosophy of definition, not meaning. why such a modeling of people is valuable is a different question than how it works. interscience as defined by reproducibility, measurability, falsifiability, etc. as borne out has tended to become a failed project (“a.i.” was deemed a downside back in 2007). so then question of pedigree is not enough (valuability): mechanism independence, estimability (predictive power), testability, theory negotiability (conservatism), sizeability (modularity) of a model explains what some join baruch spinoza in calling the power of the multitude or “collective representations” or “manipulating shadows”* (as fielding and taylor put it).
- fielding, r. t., and r. n. taylor. 2002. “principled design of the modern web architecture.” acm transactions on internet technology (toit) 2, no. 2:115–50.
- Submitted 1 year ago to aboringdystopia@lemmy.world | 6 comments