ABasilPlant
@ABasilPlant@lemmy.world
InfoSec Person | Alt-Account#2
- Comment on I use Zip Bombs to Protect my Server 15 hours ago:
Not exactly what you asked, but do you know about ufw-blocklist?
I’ve been using this on my multiple VPSes for some time now and the number of fail2ban failed/banned has gone down like crazy. Previously, I had 20k failed attempts after a few months and 30-50 currently-banned IPs at all times; now it’s less than 1k failed after a year and maybe 3-ish banned at any time.
There was also that paid service where users share their spammy IP address attempts with a centralized network, which does some dynamic intelligence monitoring. I forgot the name and search these days isn’t great. Something to do with “Sense”? It was paid, but well recommended as far as I remember.
- Comment on YKK’s Self-Propelled Zipper: Less Crazy Than It Seems 3 days ago:
PR Video to save you a click: youtu.be/mWKhSrsj3V0
- Comment on It's a skill 2 months ago:
Oh boy, this was a 20 minute rabbit hole.
Tl;Dr: this is probably AI generated.
Using google image search, I found is that it was created by this account in Oct/2024:
www.instagram.com/gothtoon/p/DBh-p4WgThS/
Alternative front-end: imginn.com/p/DBh-p4WgThS/
There is the copyright symbol with this user in this image.
If you go through the comments and other posts by that user, it does look AI generated. Their threads account has a linktree, which has a link to a discord server, which I momentarily joined to see what the deal is about.
Looks like it’s a project started by a user named Emo Bot 9000, and they’ve created a bunch of characters, the most famous of which is the frog mage. This is a message on discord that supports this:
Another user asks whether the frog mage stuff is made using AI, and Emo Bot 9000 essentially replies yes:
Now, although the image in this lemmy post is, to the best of my searching, nowhere explicitly labeled AI, I think it mostly points to being generated by AI. The simplest way to confirm would be to ask them on their discord directly, which I don’t intend to do.
Although reverse search tells me there are earlier appearances of this image, they’re either false or the PFP of a commenter.
