fiercetemptation
@fiercetemptation@lemmy.world
- Comment on Why a kilobyte is 1000 and not 1024 bytes 10 months ago:
It has everything to do with the metric system. And you got it exactly the wrong way around.
Kilo is simply an SI-prefix. It’s thousand. See: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilobyte. Let me quote that here: “The kilobyte is a multiple of the unit byte for digital information. The International System of Units (SI) defines the prefix kilo as a multiplication factor of 1.000; therefore, one kilobyte is 1.000 bytes.”
That specifically is where the confusion arises. Someone went and said “oh, computers count in binary so a kilobyte is 1.024.” It’s not. A kilobyte is 1.000 bytes, because kilo is thousand.
To help fix the confusion, a different prefix was created: kibi which is specifically for multiples of 2.
The thing is: for people not using the metric system your argument may have merit. But once you have accepted that metric is superior in literally every way (also why NASA etc all use metric), this confusion just disappears.
- Comment on Why a kilobyte is 1000 and not 1024 bytes 10 months ago:
Indeed. I only commented, because I don’t think such a lengthy post about this is very relevant. It’s not hard. Well at least for non-americans (that seem to be very triggered by my comment). :D
- Comment on Why a kilobyte is 1000 and not 1024 bytes 10 months ago:
No. Kilo is 1.000/thousand. Kibi is 1.024. it’s just normal SI-units.
Of course it’s hard for Americans that don’t use metric. 😉
- Comment on Why a kilobyte is 1000 and not 1024 bytes 10 months ago:
It is really not that difficult. Kilo is always thousand.
1.000 grams = 1 kilogram 1.000 meters = 1 kilometer
Maybe it’s harder for Americans with their fantasy units.