lets_get_off_lemmy
@lets_get_off_lemmy@reddthat.com
This is a remote user, information on this page may be incomplete. View at Source ↗
- Comment on Whether you use AI, think it's a "fun stupid thing for memes", or even ignore it, you should know it's already polluting worse than global air travel. 2 days ago:
Do you have a source for this claim? I see this report by Google and MIT Tech Review that says image/video generation does use a lot of energy compared to text generation.
Taking the data from those articles, we get this table:
AI Activity Source Energy Use (per prompt) Everyday Comparison Median Gemini Text Prompt Google Report 0.24 Wh Less energy than watching a 100W TV for 9 seconds. High-Quality AI Image MIT Article ~1.22 Wh Running a standard microwave for about 4 seconds. Complex AI Text Query MIT Article ~1.86 Wh Roughly equivalent to charging a pair of wireless earbuds for 2-3 minutes. Single AI Video (5-sec) MIT Article ~944 Wh (0.94 kWh) Nearly the same energy as running a full, energy-efficient dishwasher cycle. "Daily AI Habit" MIT Article ~2,900 Wh (2.9 kWh) A bit more than an average US refrigerator consumes in a full 24-hour period. - Comment on Whether you use AI, think it's a "fun stupid thing for memes", or even ignore it, you should know it's already polluting worse than global air travel. 2 days ago:
Could you explain further?
- Comment on Encouragement 1 week ago:
This feels like it would make people buy it more because it’s such a rad sticker to have on a box. It’s like the Parental Advisory notice on CDs. It just made them way cooler and were like a badge of honor.
- Comment on The Woofstream 2 weeks ago:
absolutely no one:
me: this meme format sucks