shevchuk
@shevchuk@lemm.ee
This is a remote user, information on this page may be incomplete. View at Source ↗
- Comment on Performance, memory and CPU usage tests of Tailscale, Netbird, Zerotier 1 year ago:
I might just compare
freeoutput before / during / after iperf3 test. Will do that later today. - Comment on Performance, memory and CPU usage tests of Tailscale, Netbird, Zerotier 1 year ago:
Netbird uses kernel Wireguard module, right. Is there a way to measure kernel memory / CPU usage attributed to Wireguard? Zerotier, which has the lowest memory usage, does not use Wireguard at all, they have their own custom protocol and is userspace IIRC.
- Comment on Performance, memory and CPU usage tests of Tailscale, Netbird, Zerotier 1 year ago:
Tailscale is written in Go with lots of dependencies. It also has a lot more features, to the point some would call it bloated. That would explain those 55 MB idle memory usage difference. But those 245 MB after iperf3 test though… I can’t explain, but it’s consistent and repeatable.
- Submitted 1 year ago to selfhosted@lemmy.world | 12 comments