DigitalMus

@DigitalMus@feddit.dk

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨xkcd #2981: Slingshots⁩ ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  What about HPE slingshot? This list is clearly incomplete.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Infinite Craft, an endless crafting game, is out.⁩ ⁨⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  I feel like I met some recursive endgame boss… I made a penguapplepenguinpenguapplepenguapplepenguin partially from pineapples and penguins and something else I spam combined

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨The Future of Machine Learning: A New Breakthrough Technique (MLC)⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  This certainly could be part of the motivation for publishing it this way, to make themselves more noticed by the big players. Btw, publishing in open source nature is expensive, it’s like 6-8000 euro for the big ones, so there definitely is a reason.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨The Future of Machine Learning: A New Breakthrough Technique (MLC)⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  While in not in the field either, I do know that it is quite unusual in computer science academics to publish in actual peer reviewed journals. This is because it can be a long process, and the field is very fast moving, so your results would be outdated by the time you publish. Thus, a paper is typically synonymous with a conference proceeding, and can be found on arxiv. I found this Paper on the arxiv from 2017/2018 which seems to be when this paper was originally published for the scientific community and presented at a very “good” (if I had to guess) conference. Google scholar says this paper has 650 citations, so it probably has had quite some impact. However, I would guess this method is well known and is already implemented in many models, if it was truly disruptive.