Mtrad

@Mtrad@lemm.ee

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨College professors are going back to paper exams and handwritten essays to fight students using ChatGPT⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  That sounds like ot could be a focused lesson. Why try to skirt around what the desired goal is?

  That also could be placed into detecting if something is wrong with AI too. Teach people things to just help spot these errors.

  In my experience, it’s so much more effective to learn how to find the answers and spot the issues than to memorize how to do everything. There’s too much now to know it all yourself.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨College professors are going back to paper exams and handwritten essays to fight students using ChatGPT⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  Wouldn’t it make more sense to find ways on how to utilize the tool of AI and set up criteria that would incorporate the use of it?

  There could still be classes / lectures that cover the more classical methods, but I remember being told “you won’t have a calculator in your pocket”.

  My point use, they should prepping students for the skills to succeed with the tools they will have available and then give them the education to cover the gaps that AI can’t solve. For example, you basically need to review what the AI outputs for accuracy. So maybe a focus on reviewing output and better prompting techniques? Training on how to spot inaccuracies? Spotting possible bias in the system which is skewed by training data?