hazelnot
@hazelnot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
- Comment on Microsoft completes $69bn takeover of Call of Duty-maker Activision Blizzard 1 year ago:
Please look up the definition of theft lmao
I’m not “delusional” (maybe tone down the ableism btw) because I don’t see theft as something universally bad, stealing from companies is good IMO. But piracy is different because again, you’re not taking anything away from anyone, you’re making a copy of it for yourself.
- Comment on Microsoft completes $69bn takeover of Call of Duty-maker Activision Blizzard 1 year ago:
I’m glad you at least seem to enjoy the taste of boot 🤷♀️
- Comment on Microsoft completes $69bn takeover of Call of Duty-maker Activision Blizzard 1 year ago:
I don’t exclusively mean piracy, but also piracy isn’t theft because you’re not taking anything away from anyone, you’re making a copy of some files 🤷♀️
The notion that piracy is theft is capitalist bullshit designed to manipulate people’s emotions by equating a company not making as much profits as they theoretically could have to theft lol
- Comment on Microsoft completes $69bn takeover of Call of Duty-maker Activision Blizzard 1 year ago:
Steam games are obtainable in other ways. Streaming-exclusive ones aren’t.
- Comment on Microsoft completes $69bn takeover of Call of Duty-maker Activision Blizzard 1 year ago:
I’m not interested in their games either, my issue with it is that a lot of people are, and MS is trying their hardest to get a monopoly in the industry and/or turn everything into streaming-only subscription crap
- Comment on Microsoft completes $69bn takeover of Call of Duty-maker Activision Blizzard 1 year ago:
That’s not what I meant and you’re literally wrong lol, incredible games are made every year. My problem with this is that Microsoft is trying to turn gaming into its corporate cloud-only monopoly.
- Comment on Microsoft completes $69bn takeover of Call of Duty-maker Activision Blizzard 1 year ago:
Except Microsoft is building up a monopoly on gaming, buying what they can, consolidating its properties so they can then transition to a streaming-only model where nobody owns anything (I know you don’t technically “own” the games you buy either but at least you can have them on physical media to keep, back up or sell) and the only way to play anything is to pay a monthly subscription fee and to use only what Microsoft allows you to use (i.e. no more Linux gaming)
- Comment on Microsoft completes $69bn takeover of Call of Duty-maker Activision Blizzard 1 year ago:
RIP video games
- Comment on BBC will block ChatGPT AI from scraping its content 1 year ago:
I agree. Nothing should be copyrighted. But everyone should try their hardest to stop “AI” scammers and the surveillance apparatus as a whole
- Comment on BBC will block ChatGPT AI from scraping its content 1 year ago:
Counter-point: everyone should block AI shit, fuck the laws
- Comment on Lasers Could Soon Power U.S. Military Bases—And Not Even Jamming Could Stop It 1 year ago:
Our base is under attack
Unit lost
Low power
Unit lost
- Comment on Russia, China, Iran state media see boost on X after removal of ‘state-affiliated’ labels 1 year ago:
So instead of labeling Western propaganda as well, the solution is obviously to not label any propaganda whatsoever so people can be lied to by both sides?
- Comment on Apple may be quiet on AI, but it’s also the biggest buyer of AI companies 1 year ago:
So what you’re saying is that it’s a win for everyone except some borderline scammers then?
- Comment on Why you shouldn't use Brave Browser 1 year ago:
more compatible
That’s because at this point Google basically has a monopoly on the web. They’re pushing what they want, because they control most of the browser marketshare through not only Chrome but every other browser based on it. That’s also the main reason to not use Chromium-based browsers, because it’s helping Google strengthen their monopoly.