RumRunningDevil

There’s actually a reasonable argument for global regulation of AI.

Every country faces an economic doom loop as AI becomes more capable, once it is capable of automating away a sufficient amount of labor the economy will spiral. This means every country, in a game theory sense, is facing a no-win prisoners dillema. That is precisely the recipe that allowed for nuclear nonproliferation.

It is completely within the realm of possibility for the international community to agree to control the training of models at the national level and heavily regulate distribution commercially, similar to what we do with nuclear power.

Holy shit man… You’re talking to the fuckers?

The documentation is what gets me. Why did a bot need to write the documentation?

I can stomach using an LLM as basically a really good static analyzer (begrudgingly) but having it write the docs? How do I know you know what the code does if you didn’t even write the docs?

They explicitly reference the LLM generated front end code eventually being replaced when they can “hire a proper JS/CSS” dev.

So hopefully that happens in the near future!

Love the disclosure of AI in the frontend, will be keeping and eye on this one as he replaces the frontend code.

Very cool!