shinigamiookamiryuu
@shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee
- Comment on Welcome, new users! 1 week ago:
So much for the growing.
- Submitted 2 weeks ago to animemes@ani.social | 0 comments
- Comment on [deleted] 3 weeks ago:
The context behind the last part is that certain marginalized friends wanted someone on the inside to act as a buffer in case they come up in conversations, and it led to a whole debate about whether the intentions of the founders of a community, the intentions of the majority of a community, and the intentions of each individual in a community can be separated. I am an individual and don’t endorse the values the group is associated with. I previously used the analogy of an alternate timeline where nobody likes Uncle Iroh because he joined the fire nation military even though he never actually did any of the fighting. It’s an oversimplification to say I’m “defending kiwifarms”.
- Comment on [deleted] 3 weeks ago:
I’m going by dictionary definitions, not what a certain biased organization says. I wouldn’t deny both of the organizations you mention there are biased. But the dictionary isn’t.
Suppose you are right and the ADL is biased and controlled “by Zionism” (which sounds a bit like a conspiracy theory). What does that make the Snopes organization? What does that make the literal 50% of America who doesn’t disagree with the ADL? What does that make the people who call it a double standard that so many people are willing to support murder of one kind but not another, or that intentions matter sometimes but not all the time?
- Comment on [deleted] 3 weeks ago:
It’s a war crime. Not all war crimes are a genocide. Certain criteria have to be fulfilled for that. Similar to how not all mass shootings are acts of terrorism. Are you really dedicating a whole confrontation just to debate semantics?
- Comment on [deleted] 3 weeks ago:
I’m not searching for conflict. The people you allude to keep coming to me. I didn’t really even know your name before you came to me, for example. Besides, I’m not the only one who has offered to fill the shoes. If everyone got lucky with that except me, I would still support them.
- Comment on [deleted] 3 weeks ago:
How is that genocide denial?
- Comment on [deleted] 3 weeks ago:
Whole instances have banned each other. And it’s not really uncommon for people to be banned from multiple places. It’s a rite of passage to be banned by ML, for example.
- Comment on [deleted] 3 weeks ago:
You do realize that simply linking to something in a place like that once isn’t the same as being that individual, right?
- Comment on [deleted] 3 weeks ago:
A few points from someone who knows how this works.
- Everyone has been “banned” from multiple places. Nobody has a perfect score. But that’s just defederation for you. Whether they’re even “bans” or not is technical.
- What you point to are technicalities, ones which have been brigaded upon me constantly by you and others who show the signs of being “alts” in all but name. Sometimes you phrase it as “she is a Nazi” just because you know you’re speaking to the right audience to demonize me when none of that applies. The second thing is also inapplicable here in the way you are applying it, for the same reasons. I don’t defend harassment. I don’t defend racism, ableism, transphobia, or homophobia. I don’t defend marginalization. Get that out of your head.
- If all the signs are right about who you are, not only are you ban evading to try to tell us all of this, but you’re also someone who even people in charge have had to point out tries to weaponize the karma system to make those you have a grudge on seem worse than they are.
- Comment on [deleted] 3 weeks ago:
May I @EllaSpiggins@lemm.ee?
- Submitted 2 months ago to meta@lemm.ee | 2 comments
- Comment on Why do people see me as far older than 19 when I type the way I do sometimes?/Why do people think full stops are rude? 3 months ago:
It’s about norms and vibes and nothing more. Their conclusion that you’re over 19 has about as much validity and basis as the feeling they will win the next scratch-off ticket.
- Comment on Can I still consider myself a “young woman” after I turn 24? I turn 24 in March (next month). 3 months ago:
It wouldn’t hurt. It’s a relative word. Some people way past their prime still could technically say they’re young or feel young.
- Comment on Am I stroking it in my sleep? 3 months ago:
It’s possible. You could constrict your hands somehow to find out.
I would also warn that, if you do anything in your sleep like this that is atypical of sleep, you are probably not getting a good night sleep internally.
- Comment on Is 17 and almost 20 wrong? 3 months ago:
Just a reminder that breaking the law isn’t ideal here. The laws that are there are there for a reason. My high school was full of instances where individuals who were seniors were with freshmans. And then the seniors turned 18, as time tends to do with people. They had to wait things out with some of the “pillars” (if you could call them that) of the kind of thing they were looking for. Where I live, there is no equivalent to the “Romeo and Juliet law”, the kind of law that might calibrate (perhaps overly so, or not in a good way) this kind of thing. Which some will say or point out is for the best. Whatever you do, I’d encourage you look up your laws to get an idea on this and how they map out the specifics. Can you settle for something that doesn’t clash with these? Yes? Good, settle for that. Some things can wait, my friend.
- Comment on [deleted] 3 months ago:
Art trades are a pastime in the art world where commissions are done with art instead of with goods/money. The art you give goes to the person you’re giving it to, and they do the same for you.
- Comment on [deleted] 3 months ago:
They’ve been there, tried that, and none produced the outcome OP seems like they’re thinking of.
- Comment on [deleted] 3 months ago:
Doesn’t that require intent?
- Comment on [deleted] 3 months ago:
Doesn’t that require intent?
- Comment on [deleted] 3 months ago:
How would you know you’re not dealing with someone who actually is a woman?
- Comment on [deleted] 3 months ago:
The OP speaks of me. This is the third person/persona doing so. Do you really think “blocking” will be something in their modus operandi at this point?
- Comment on [deleted] 3 months ago:
The OP speaks of me. I have been brought before people for this kind of thing. Authorities though attest I haven’t done anything worth responding to, proving OP is making a mountain out of a molehill. I’m also she/her.
- Comment on [deleted] 3 months ago:
Doesn’t that require intent?
- Comment on [deleted] 3 months ago:
The OP speaks of me. Authorities have been called. They attest I haven’t done anything worth responding to, proving OP is making a mountain out of a molehill.
- Comment on [deleted] 3 months ago:
The OP is making these claims about me. I have communicated with authorities, and they can attest I haven’t done anything worth responding to. Does anyone think they can make calls on me? I’d like to watch them try (and maybe then will people realize this is all overkill).
- Comment on [deleted] 3 months ago:
And not neither? You’re judging someone’s mental state just based on two images. Like, do you even play Dungeons and Dragons?
- Comment on [deleted] 3 months ago:
You say that like art trades aren’t a thing.
- Comment on [deleted] 3 months ago:
I spoke of it earlier. The OP is talking about me. But the accusations are false. Fifteen “suspicious” works of art and not a single one turns up anywhere, which is natural if they’re mine.
- Comment on [deleted] 3 months ago:
Things can still be reverse-searched. And the things in question don’t turn up anything. Nothing. There are maybe twenty works of art in question and none turn up anything. There is no theft.
