dragonfly4933
@dragonfly4933@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- Comment on Advocates raise alarm over Pfas pollution from datacenters amid AI boom 4 days ago:
You seem reasonable and don’t deserve the downvotes.
Evaporative cooling is mostly used in hyperscale facilities, so most places you would ever visit would usually be cooled the typical way.
It’s cheaper because running a compressor costs quite a lot of power, even modern efficient systems still cost more to operate than pumping water out of the ground at near zero cost.
It is also difficult to find information on this topic since these large companies want to keep this information on the down low, that they are consuming a disproportionate amount of ground water.
In a lot of the US, individuals depend on ground water for their needs with their own pumps. It has started occurring that large facilities are built and it starts affecting nearby residents. Sometimes it causes a significant drop in water quality. Over time, they might not be able to get water from their existing well because millions of gallons were extracted for cooling a data center.
The public would be probably be extra pissed if they found out about this.
- Comment on Advocates raise alarm over Pfas pollution from datacenters amid AI boom 5 days ago:
Water isn’t a renewable resource, especially not if the source of water is underground aquifers.
This is a long post, but these matters could be of grave importance.
The reason water isn’t always renewable is that statistically, most of the water on earth ends up in the oceans where it gets “trapped”. Sure, some of it evaporates and rains, but most of the rain is over the ocean. Some rain obviously makes it back to land, but most of it still stays in the ocean.
It’s extra bad if you pump water out of the ground from what are called aquifers. The water in the ground has taken thousands of years to build up, so pumping it out for dumb reasons is not a good idea. We could argue about growing food with ground water, but most people might consider squandering ground water where it is optional to do so, to be short sighted.
At least some data centers pump water out of aquifers for the purposes of evaporative cooling. This is a method of cooling that is the same as “swap” coolers. It works by taking advantage of the fact that when a liquid undergoes a phase transition, there is a large exchange of energy.
This is a similar effect to how people can be cooled off by sweating. The sweat evaporates and it leaves the skin cooler, because when the liquid evaporates, heat is taken out of the skin.
Back to data centers, some pump water out of aquifers, and intentionally evaporate the water to remove heat out of whatever media is used for cooling chips/servers.
Why do they use this method of cooling? Because it’s cheaper. Typical hvac systems involving compressors consume power and power costs money. So in effect, they are consuming water, an essential and non-renewable resource, in order to avoid having to pay for electricity to cool their servers in a more sustainable way. Evaporative cooling is not necessary to cool a data center. Data centers have been and still are cooled by typical hvac systems which do not consume water in this manner.
A common retort is “can’t the vapor be condensed back into water?” Yes, but they don’t because that would cost money. As mentioned earlier, creating the vapor consumed heat. To create water, energy would need to be spent to take the heat back out of the water. This is an unavoidable fact of thermodynamics.
Also, do not confuse evaporative cooling with what some people call a “water” loop. In such a loop, water is being used to move heat from one location to another, in a loop, similar to how water cooled PCs work. This is often done because air has a poor heat capacity, so the size ducts needed to move an adequate amount of air could be too big to be practical, so in these systems, the heat is transferred into water, usually to be sent to a heat exchanger (radiator/heat sink). The water does not undergo a phase transition in a typical water loop. The water merely is hotter when it leaves the so called “air conditioner” and cooler when it leaves the heat exchanger, heading back to the AC. The compressors in the AC units are what is doing the heavy lifting in these style systems.
- Comment on Linux royalty backs adoption of Rust for kernel code 7 months ago:
Comparing python to rust, rust has far fewer breaking updates than python, and thats a fact. Feature updates can and do break older code in python, whereas in rust this is simply not allowed with few exceptions.
The language is allowed to change in compatible ways with editions. Every few years a new edition is released which allows otherwise breaking changes to be implemented, but the old and new code can still work together. Developers can rev the edition version when they want. I also think cargo might be able to help upgrade to a new edition as well.
Rust isn’t perfect, but python fails to learn the lessons that even perl implemented decades ago.