Francisco
@Francisco@mander.xyz
- Comment on This week in science 4 months ago:
Great summary, thanks!
Despite the great images of IO the linked article comes with this mud pearl “[University of Arizona’s Large Binocular Telescope] With two primary mirrors measuring 8.4 m (~27.5 ft), it has a collecting area slightly greater than that of a 30-meter (98.4 ft) telescope.”
- Comment on Caption this. 6 months ago:
Original sketches for the drinking scene on the Predator movie.
- Comment on Rare cross-shaped reliquary unearthed from medieval knight's home in Poland 1 year ago:
according to Science in Poland.
- Comment on NASA's Curiosity rover reaches Mars ridge where water left debris pileup 1 year ago:
Same content on archive .ph
- Comment on Analysis: Most research on PFAS harms is unpublicized 1 year ago:
Thanks for your answers and perspective, trully. Even if none of us have changed their opinion.
I see adjectivation and categorization as parts of reasoning. I think you used a red herring in order to have a strong opinion about it. With the same cheakyness, I’ll quote yourself
I can’t say whether this is an important issue, because I don’t have any experience in this area.
I take issue
- Comment on Analysis: Most research on PFAS harms is unpublicized 1 year ago:
You feel free to use expressions and terms as “rub me the wrong way”, “buzzwords”, and “clickbait”. In those cases you are okay with the listener/reader interpreting the implicit meaning over their explicit wording. Why is “forever chemicals” different? Specially in an informal communication setting.
- Comment on Analysis: Most research on PFAS harms is unpublicized 1 year ago:
What would you consider as okay to mention as ‘forever chemicals’?