AGreenPurple

@AGreenPurple@lemmynsfw.com

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨People are playing fewer games and new releases are "struggling", say Ubisoft UK, warning of falling revenues⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago⁩:

  Arc Raiders is doing so many things right from the start. The overall package was even at release very well executed, it’s an extraction shooter that keeps the tension of the genre while at the same time removing most of the frustrating elements. While there could be sind improvements to the Speranza UI design, the overall look of the game in game is stunning and it runs really well.

  And looking at the number of players - if you release good, entertaining games, people will play them.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Zelensky slams Russia after three generations killed in drone strike⁩ ⁨⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Before the real attack underwater, they sent other drones at the bridge to get traffic blocked

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Is Civilization 7 not fun?⁩ ⁨⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  I played Humankind as well, but I like the execution in Civ better (despite the bugs and unfinished ui). Butt yes, the idea want original at all.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Is Civilization 7 not fun?⁩ ⁨⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  If you have never played Civ before it would be a good time to start with Civ 5 or maybe even Civ 3. They are cheap and quite polished.

  In my opinion (having played Civ since the first game, yes I’m old), Civ 7 is quite ok in it’s foundations, but it’s clearly released too early and like the other parts before it’s mainly a game about optimizing numbers, not so much about strategy.

  Biggest turn off for me is the introduction of “rogue like” mechanics that give you to play certain characters and nations in a certain way to access others. Why would I want to have that crap in a strategy game?