Fedegenerate
@Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
- Comment on Dog attacks are still rising - even after the XL bully ban 1 week ago:
The fact that we’re even talking about bully XLs is proof the last dog ban didn’t work. Don’t know how people were fooled into believing this one would.
- Comment on Dog attacks are still rising - even after the XL bully ban 1 week ago:
Sees evidence it doesn’t work, *let’s do it more".
They’ll just buy rottweilers, or create a new breed. Ban those, they’ll create more new breeds. Ban all dogs so there’s no “loopholes” they’ll raise goats or something.
Breed bans don’t work, you have evidence it doesn’t work (this isn’t the only breed ban, it didn’t work in the past either). It’s weird to assert they do.
- Comment on Big Brother just got an upgrade. Starting December, Amazon’s Ring cameras will scan and recognize faces. Don’t want to be in their database? Too bad — walk past a Ring and your face can be stored... 1 week ago:
Oh I do love a bit of ablelism. I’m clearly mentally ill.
I have shown you that you can’t tell by looking at the lock.
I have suggested other locks than electric. Yale, keypad.
I do not want to replace my lock, I want to add another lock.
1 abhorrent statement and 3 incorrect statements. Can you admit they’re incorrect?
Now answer the question, which of the above locks were locked?
- Comment on Big Brother just got an upgrade. Starting December, Amazon’s Ring cameras will scan and recognize faces. Don’t want to be in their database? Too bad — walk past a Ring and your face can be stored... 1 week ago:
Okay, so that last picture - that knob has 2 positions for locked vs unlocked, which whomever owns the lock presumably would know upon visual inspection. Like how every lock like that works. Are you human?
Incorrect, thats my lock it spins more than 360 degrees. I’ll prove it
I swapped its state. Is the first picture locked, or the second? Your arrogance is astonishing.
The rest of that… I go back to my previous point regarding fires and needing a key to exit.
What’s my current SHTF plan and why do you believe it’s insufficient?
Changing a mechanical lock is simple and I’d never keep a lock like that on my door, along with most normal and sane people who can critically think. Housing codes were written in blood.
What’s my current SHTF plan, and why do you believe its insufficient
That’s nice, if I changed it to the above lock, would the first picture be locked? Or the second? Please answer you’ve tre to evade the question a number of times now. I’ve given you the lock you want, I’ve shown you locked and unlocked states.
Second question you’ve ignored: what, in you’re understanding, is the problem I am trying to solve? How do seeing intruders faces solve it?
You can’t keep ignoring me to assert your position, that’s not a conversation. A conversation is back and forth, you didn’t lie the lock, I showed one you like. You didn’t like only having one state, I’ve shown you both. I tell you you’re not listening to the problem I want to solve, you continue to solve a different problem.
Quit it.
- Comment on Big Brother just got an upgrade. Starting December, Amazon’s Ring cameras will scan and recognize faces. Don’t want to be in their database? Too bad — walk past a Ring and your face can be stored... 1 week ago:
The interior of your door cannot be a key lock like that due to code.
I am one of the dozens of people that do not live in your city, as such suffer different laws. Also my house is older than any such laws. I implore you to think that perhaps I know my locks better than you. So again, I’ll ask the question you avoided: is that lock open or closed? You didn’t answer the question.
Your second paragraph is just telling me things I’ve been telling you. Yes, if someone want in they’re coming in, the electronic lock isn’t for that, I’ve repeated that almost every comment. So I’ll ask you a second question: what do you believe the second lock is for? I don’t think you know despite me repeating that and infinitum too.
A camera inside the house isn’t visible and as such can’t act as a deterrent, it doesn’t even solve the problem you posted. Again, imagine for a minute, that I know the layout of my house better than you.
- Comment on Big Brother just got an upgrade. Starting December, Amazon’s Ring cameras will scan and recognize faces. Don’t want to be in their database? Too bad — walk past a Ring and your face can be stored... 1 week ago:
Yup, cameras, should I set them up, will store locally. I don’t think I want a camera on the lock though.
That article says that I, as a random bypasser, suffer all the disadvantages of Ring but without any of the benefits of owning one. I’m still not getting a ring though.
- Comment on Big Brother just got an upgrade. Starting December, Amazon’s Ring cameras will scan and recognize faces. Don’t want to be in their database? Too bad — walk past a Ring and your face can be stored... 1 week ago:
All my locks are bypassable by breaking my window. All locks are pickable, all electronic locks are hackable.
My locks don’t look any different between “locked” and “unlocked” except by carefully looking down the door jam. It’s just a keyhole in a door. A camera pointed at the door doesn’t solve the problem I am trying to solve.
Thank you for your input though.
- Comment on Big Brother just got an upgrade. Starting December, Amazon’s Ring cameras will scan and recognize faces. Don’t want to be in their database? Too bad — walk past a Ring and your face can be stored... 1 week ago:
I know, which is why it’s not going to be my primary lock.
For someone to bypass my locks, instead of breaking a window, a bunch of things have to come about and they’re all “and” statements.
First, I would have to forget to lock the door, I don’t typically forget, I just get anxiety about it and it can ruin a nice day. With the electric lock I would be content someone can’t just opportunisticly walk in.
And someone would have to want to get in my house enough to put effort into it. They’re breaking a window at this point regardless of the locks. Or they’re testing a neighbour’s door, with only one lock.
And they would have to identify that only the electric lock is active.
And they would have to have the tools/skills to break an electric lock. Along with the skills/tools to break a traditional
If any of those statements is false, I would be no worse off, or better off, with an electric lock. If they want in, they’re coming through a window.
I did think about a Yale as an auxiliary lock, but I’ve run up against it’s advantages (read: locking myself out) more than once. Also, if they can bypass the main lock, they can bypass a Yale, I figure, as it’s a similar skillset.
- Comment on Big Brother just got an upgrade. Starting December, Amazon’s Ring cameras will scan and recognize faces. Don’t want to be in their database? Too bad — walk past a Ring and your face can be stored... 1 week ago:
I was looking to install an electronic lock as a redundancy for the tumbler lock to decrease “have I locked the fucking door” anxiety.
The problem could be solved with Yale lock. I’d just be swapping the disadvantages of a Yale for the disadvantages of an Electric lock.
But cool automations are cool, and who doesn’t love a little over engineering?
- Comment on Green Party Set To Debate Policy Of Abolishing Landlords 2 weeks ago:
Greens going from strength to strength. Re meda isn’t going to like it.
- Comment on Record breaker Starmer is the 'most unpopular PM since polling began' 2 weeks ago:
I didn’t say he was a political figure. I listed but one example of him being a cockwomble, one you agree with.
There are more, the “what’s wrong with Clarkson” question was answered.
- Comment on Record breaker Starmer is the 'most unpopular PM since polling began' 2 weeks ago:
Climate change denial for a start? Of course he walked it back after started to affect him personally, typical conservative really.
To ask “What’s wrong with Clarkson?” you’d have to know nothing about him.
- Comment on Home secretary calls Gaza protests in wake of Manchester attack ‘un-British’ 2 weeks ago:
Keep protesting genocide. Don’t murder random Jews.
- Comment on Record breaker Starmer is the 'most unpopular PM since polling began' 2 weeks ago:
Who’s setting up a lettuce stream? If lettuce streams become a tradition of unwelcome politicians I wouldn’t be mad.
- Comment on Record breaker Starmer is the 'most unpopular PM since polling began' 2 weeks ago:
We had the most family run farms when we had the inheritance tax on them.
- Comment on Reducing buffering when accessing Jellyfin via Tailscale 2 weeks ago:
Sames, I have a bunch of users(2) all streaming jellyfin fine over tailscale, except one house which buffers sporadically over the day.
Their internet speed is fine. It could be WiFi being saturated in their area. It could be the relay being a very old rPi3 just isn’t up to it (The pi, captures their requests through Pi-Hole and proxyies their traffic over tailscale). It could be the laptop they’re using as a client isn’t up to it. Or it could be some setting somewhere.
It’s annoying whatever it is.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
Not too close. My Proxmox server is basically set up, I can’t fit anything more on it, so it’s just back end and tinkering now. I’m comfortable with Proxmox.
That said, new box and a large windfall I’d have a look at Unraid. After donating to Proxmox at least that much first.
If Proxmox didn’t exist (and TTeck didn’t exist) I think I would have at least tested Unraid. I was comfy in Debian with Docker as a virtualisation host before moving to Proxmox anyways.
I’m sure it’s good, I would like to give it a go. I’m happy where I am though.
- Comment on Mmmm... Yeah. It checks out. 2 weeks ago:
It was more a plea to cat owners that know their cat. The cats I know don’t tolerate cats on the street outside their house, let alone inside, plenty of people around though. I’m sure there’s exceptions, I don’t know cats well, but as a rule I think they’re territorial against cats, not humans.
- Comment on Mmmm... Yeah. It checks out. 2 weeks ago:
Easy test at home. Bring a strange human into your house, note the reaction. Bring a strange cat into your house, is the reaction the same?
- Comment on read banned books 3 weeks ago:
- Comment on Selfhosting Sunday! What's up? 3 weeks ago:
Thanks, I’ll check it out. Speedy could be interesting for games that used the CPU speed as a clock speed.
The LinuxServerIO peeps make fantastic images. When my server was docker only they pretty much built my homelab. I’m sure my docker hosts still have a bunch of their stuff, *arrs are probably all them.
- Comment on Selfhosting Sunday! What's up? 3 weeks ago:
Cleanuparr/Huntarr just got upgraded to a late-summer project.
- Comment on Selfhosting Sunday! What's up? 3 weeks ago:
I’ve been on full maintenance mode for spring/summer, those are the times to be going placed and doing things. Autumn I’m going to write my winter goals for the server.
I have another n100 box that I’m going to dedicate to immich, I have 7 users now, so when they all upload on a night my current n100 has a little bit of a cry.
Security is always a big one. I’m currently relying on tailscale (limited to necessary lxcs), reverse proxies, Https, and app ‘sign ins’. Not bad (it’s bad) but not good either.
For new projects, I want to integrate Audiobookshelf with Hardcover. I’ve got a project installed but it didn’t work on my first attempt so I gave it up for winter.
I’d like to set up a virtual DosBox, accessable by a browser, for my 1000s of dos games. Again I’ve found a few projects, none worked out of the box so have been given up for winter.
Other than all my front end services are working well. *arrs are becoming a pain for all the malware named as good files confusing rad/sonarr. Qbit knows not to download .exes, and the like, but sonarr doesn’t know to delete them and look again. Lazylibrarian accepts no shit though, if things aren’t going as expected LL very quickly deletes and goes again. I might try vibecode a script for that.
I’d like to break out my storage into a dedicate box. Probably get some e-waste to fill with drives. Currently I have a n100 running network, storage and virtualization, it’s a little cramped.
It’s probably smarter to break out networking first, build a little router/firewall box (the above n100 mini would be perfect). But, I don’t get along with networking, I find it challenging in an unsatisfying way. When I’m done banging my head against the wall and things work I’m just relieved I don’t have to do it again, instead of feeling accomplished. New projects are fun, Storage I get the feeling of accomplishment of doing the thing. Networking is a dark art full of black boxes I don’t understand that sometimes play nice together and mostly fuck my shit up.
I want to move over to IPv6, not for any other reason than it’s probably a good idea to progress to the 2000s. If I can move everything over to hostnames however, that’d be the dream.
Moving from Docker to Podman is probably smart.
Lots to do over winter… I’m probably gonna build a fish tank instead
- Comment on Keir Starmer in crisis as Labour drops to 16% in devastating new poll 4 weeks ago:
Nonce: child rapist.
Refering to Trump mostly, but our Prince Andrew is also a child molestor. He’s walking free and living a life of luxury few of us will achieve.
- Comment on Keir Starmer in crisis as Labour drops to 16% in devastating new poll 4 weeks ago:
16% so far. Tax the wealth. Stop funding the genocide. Stop throwing minorities under the bus. Stop sucking up to nonces. Improve people’s lives: we can no longer afford circuses, we can barely afford bread.
- Comment on 4 weeks ago:
Someone says that movie was cool. You protest that the movie wasn’t a ‘low but not freezing temperature’. You receive pushback for being a pedant. You:
I find it hilarious that being correct is being ignorant. It’s ok that you’re wrong, it’s your right.
Your last comment made such good progress. You recognised it was your failing to understand the language being spoken. You projected that lack onto everyone else by suggesting no-one could keep up. But you recognised it was a listener’s failure. Why the regression?
Communication is a co-operative tool. It is on the speaker to use language appropriate for the likely listeners true. Like an English speaker going into a rural Japanese restaurant and trying to order in English. The speaker did that, we all understood what was meant by ‘nazi’.
But also it is on the listener to learn the language likely to be spoken. Like an English speaker going into a rural Japanese restaurant and getting mad everyone because everything is in Japanese. This is you, you are in an online ‘restaurant’ of a sort getting mad at everyone else for not speaking the language you speak, in the way you want to speak it.
I’ll note that this main character syndrome that everyone else should conform to their way of speaking is common among English speakers.
Of course i do, but since it’s not clear from language that I do due to the reasons that I laid out, I understand that you’re confused. See how language is confusing when words change meaning? Oh, the irony.
It was clear from the context. Notice how I keep making great emphasis on the context in which the words are being used. I was mocking you for a point made you made without thought coming back to bite you.
- Comment on 4 weeks ago:
So don’t use ‘nazi’ that way, no-one is forcing you.
‘Do you know the saying that movie was cool.’ You know they aren’t saying ‘the movie was a low but not freezing temperature.’
So here’s someone complaining about the use of ‘cool’ and they say ‘I think i’d rather use the terms correctly, rather than follow the erronious zeitgeist’.
Just imagine the scenario, some people talking about a film, someone says it’s cool, and here you come charging in with your pedantry. No-one is talking about the film anymore, because you’re arguing about the usage of the word cool. Then you go full sanctimonious and say “I think i’d rather use the terms correctly, rather than follow the erronious zeitgeist”. Is that a sufficient mirror for you.
Just because technology has created micro universes where word change meaning faster than anyone can follow, doesn’t mean they are right.
Faster than anyone can follow? I followed it. Everyone in this thread followed it. It only seemed to be you out of the loop. That’s fine, but you didn’t have to expose your ignorance so publicly. You’ll pick up the lingo eventually.
Or to put it more sarcastically so you have something to think about. I literally don’t care, literally.
But you didn’t explain how you were using each version of literally?! Thereby proving your earlier complaint “that it would render words meaningless” incorrect. If nothing else I am glad I could have taught you that much. Maybe if I was able to teach you that people don’t have to spend all their time explaining definitions, I can teach you how silly pedantry is.
But you do care though, you obviously care.
- Comment on 4 weeks ago:
It wasn’t in bad faith.
History has shown that fascists in power are going to do terrible things. It doesn’t matter what you do or don’t do, they are going to do the terrible things they want to do regardless.
This policy of “don’t provoke them with your mean memes” is the kind of powerless fear that the abusers are trying to instill in you.
History has also shown that there a few ways of dislodging facists when in power. Smooth talking isn’t one of them.
I appreciate you’re not interested ZMonster, I’m not expecting a reply. Purely an explaination for anyone reading through the thread.
- Comment on 4 weeks ago:
What’s all well and good? I see no evidence you are listening, and some direct evidence that you are not.
Once again, you are railing against how the English language works, and has always worked.
‘Literally’ means both ‘literally’ and it’s opposite ‘figuratively’. People using ‘literally’ to mean figuratively aren’t wrong to do so as long as it is understood between speaker and listener what is meant.
I’m the current zeitgeist, it is understood in casual settings ‘nazi’ is used to mean ‘right wing authoritarian’. Get all upset if you wish, there’s a long history of people being upset about time’s effect on language, I’m sure you can remember your grandparents clutching pearls at the slang and short hand you used growing up. You don’t have to like it, English doesn’t care. Keep up, or don’t, up to you.
All you are doing is pettifogging.
- Comment on 4 weeks ago:
Once again, the entire history of our language is mocking you. Please see my earlier comment.
You are doubly wrong, distinctions between right-wing authoritarians isn’t important in this context.
Words do not lose meaning, they change and are understood through context. I gave you an example already:
When I use the word ‘literally’ in a sentence I do not have to explain my definiton (literally/figurativly) being used.
Otherwise you end up in a conversation with someone and you end up spending all of the time explaining ‘your’ definition of what a word means.
See above, if you had read my earlier comment you wouldn’t have wasted your, our my time with this
