statue_smudge

@statue_smudge@lemmy.world

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Apple Starts Sending 'Batterygate' Settlement Payments to iPhone Users⁩ ⁨⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  The article says it’s $92.17

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Apple is sending out checks for ‘batterygate’ class action claims⁩ ⁨⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  The first paragraph of the article says $92.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Tesla Cybertruck gets less than 80% of advertised range in YouTuber’s test⁩ ⁨⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  There’s more air resistance at higher speeds.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨What is the average temperature of earth?⁩ ⁨⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  By mass or by volume?

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Cool sorting algorithm from LinkLonk.⁩ ⁨⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  Storing it as a sparse graph should reduce the storage requirements drastically, since most edges wouldn’t exist.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Lemmy.world Should Defederate with Threads⁩ ⁨⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩:

  They also don’t get access to all the data that I think is most invasive (federated or not). I expect my posts, comments, votes, and follows on a public forum to be public. I don’t expect which posts I open, which comments I read, and how long I view each one for (a much larger and more invasive pool of data) to be public, and that’s what I don’t want Meta to get. By not using threads, they don’t get that. By using threads (or any Meta product) they do get that, and they probably use it to shovel more ads in your face.

  While I am a little cautious of the possibility of EEE, I feel like the majority of fediverse users are anti-corporation and relatively technically informed, and would anticipate any attempts to extinguish it would be poorly received and ineffective.

  Either way, federating with threads won’t give them any non-public information, which is substantially better than if you used their products directly. The other information is there for anyone to grab, so it’s kind of weird to complain about them reading it. If you put up a sign in your yard, you wouldn’t complain about people who walk by reading it.