Ward
@Ward@lemmy.nz
Open source developer & privacy advocate.
- Comment on Expanding Materialious to other platforms 6 months ago:
It requires the Invidious instance to have the correct COR values for Materialious, but yes connects to a existing instance.
- Comment on Expanding Materialious to other platforms 6 months ago:
Materialious does currently just use Invidious’ API. If extending it requires a custom backend it will be a completely different project (what will still be using Invidious)
- Comment on Expanding Materialious to other platforms 6 months ago:
Isn’t just a theme, is a completely different application built on top of Invidious’ API. What works completely differently to Invidious’ current UI. A LOT of things are handled different then how Invidious handles it on their frontend. Replacing Invidious current interface with Materialious isn’t a good idea, because its quite a bit bigger & requires JS compared to Invidious’ current UI.
Currently Materialios a theme would be like calling clipious a theme.
- Comment on Expanding Materialious to other platforms 7 months ago:
I believe loading videos directly works, but discover/trending doesn’t to my understanding.
- Comment on Expanding Materialious to other platforms 7 months ago:
Yea just need to avoid it from being bloated
- Comment on Expanding Materialious to other platforms 7 months ago:
Yea, Materialious is a bit more complex then a theme as it has a lot of custom client side logic (Like sync parties, playlists, etc).
If I expanded Materialious you’d still be able to use just Invidious or Safetwitch etc.
But Materialious at its core would still be built of the API of giants. So it wouldn’t be reinventing the wheel for scrapping/handling data from twitch, YouTube extra.
Haven’t used Proxitok in a while, so not sure if its working currently. Seems to be in active development tho.
- Submitted 7 months ago to privacyguides@lemmy.one | 12 comments
- Comment on The state of open source SMS messagers 11 months ago:
does Partisan-SMS function as a basic sms messager without encryption?
- Submitted 11 months ago to privacyguides@lemmy.one | 48 comments
- Comment on OmitMe - Your Privacy-Centric, Easily Extendable Data Deletion Solution 1 year ago:
Basically think of it as a SDK for defining data deletion on a platform. Omitme handles all the annoying stuff like account storage, building a CLI/GUI & sessions.
The core of Omitme is Seleniumwire used to grab login session tokens for platforms & HTTPX for making requests with those session tokens. Then you simply define you data deletion “targets” and the API calls to delete such data.
- Submitted 1 year ago to privacyguides@lemmy.one | 2 comments
- Comment on Simplifying warrant canaries - Purplix canary 1 year ago:
Also to note, that Purplix does warn users to assume the site has been compromised if the latest statement has expired.
- Comment on Simplifying warrant canaries - Purplix canary 1 year ago:
Agreed, should have an alart for missed canaries. Each canary has “statements” you publish new statements to update ur canary. This provides a signed record of passed canaries.
Browser extension or even mobile app could be another aspect of further securing validation. Currently we do store a offline backup for each public key in idb storage & a signed copy if you have a account for further validation if the URL hash has been tampered with.
Thank you for your kind words ❤️❤️
- Submitted 1 year ago to privacyguides@lemmy.one | 18 comments
- Comment on A end-to-end encrypted survey tool - Purplix, now in early alpha 1 year ago:
I’d love to be covered in your blog, feel free to add me on Matrix if you have any questions.
- Comment on A end-to-end encrypted survey tool - Purplix, now in early alpha 1 year ago:
Currently we aren’t taking donations, till we have some sort of transparency system in place.
Thanks for expressing your interest in a blog, could be interested.
- Comment on A end-to-end encrypted survey tool - Purplix, now in early alpha 1 year ago:
has been a old and off project for a few months. Would call it niche in terms of people who care about e2ee tools, but in general how insecure surveys are shouldn’t be as common place as it is.
- Submitted 1 year ago to privacyguides@lemmy.one | 8 comments
- Comment on Certbot is great. Let's Encrypt is great. 1 year ago:
Certbot is great when using Nginx (or Apache2), but if you can use a different engine. Its worthwhile checking out Caddy!
