cross-posted from: lemmy.zip/post/11548313
Confirmation comes after public consultation and decision to close Gender Identity Development Service in London
Archived version: archive.ph/33GMN
If kids aren’t considered mentally developed enough to vote, smoke, drink, join the army and all the rest of it then they shouldn’t be choosing whether to block their puberty or not.
I’m against the principle that a child could end up making a choice that isn’t fully reversible.
autotldr@lemmings.world [bot] 8 months ago
This is the best summary I could come up with:
NHS England made the announcement in response to the results of a public consultation on the ban, which it first proposed last June, and a review of available evidence by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice).
The NHS’s decision reaffirms the position it adopted last year on puberty blockers after Dr Hilary Cass, who is leading an independent review into gender identity services for under-18s, issued interim advice warning against routine prescription of the drugs.
In late 2020 NHS England asked Cass, an ex-president of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, to look into gender identity services.
Maria Caulfield, the health minister, said: “We welcome this landmark decision by the NHS to end the routine prescription of puberty blockers and this guidance which recognises that care must be based on evidence, expert clinical opinion and in the best interests of the child.
“This a momentous development in the course correction of NHS England’s approach to treating childhood gender distress,” said Maya Forstater, its executive director.
“The significance of NHS England’s statement that there is not enough evidence to support the safety or clinical effectiveness of puberty blockers cannot be overstated, given the success that activist lobby groups have had in portraying them as a harmless and reversible treatment.”
The original article contains 723 words, the summary contains 213 words. Saved 71%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!