Zed, a code editors from the creators of Atom, has gone open source and seems to have a bright future awaiting.
i use macOS but don’t use any software that isn’t also available for linux (which Zed isn’t)
The New Code Editor Zed has a Strong Start, and is now Open Source
Submitted 9 months ago by moreeni@lemm.ee to programming@programming.dev
https://frontendmasters.com/blog/the-new-code-editor-zed-has-a-strong-start-and-is-now-open-source/
Comments
starry@suppo.fi 9 months ago
Cwilliams@beehaw.org 9 months ago
Isn’t one of the main macOS benefits the software?
starry@suppo.fi 9 months ago
i just don’t like feeling locked in at all.
JDubbleu@programming.dev 9 months ago
Not OP, but my main preference for MacOS comes from the UI/UX of an absolute rock solid OS on top of a unix-like shell. I regularly go months without rebooting my machine with 0 issues like software hanging on wake.
I know there are a lot of exclusive creative apps, but all I really use my MacBook for is code, typical browser stuff, music, slicer/web interface for my 3D printer, and to interact with my home server. I’m not an open-source/Linux purist by any means, but pretty much all the software I use is widely available on all platforms. It probably helps that I bought a MacBook after growing up with Windows/Linux, so I came into it with a set of software I was familiar with that already existed on other platforms.
kinttach@lemm.ee 9 months ago
This is a nice editor. I don’t like the comparisons to Atom since some of us remember that as “the really bloated and slow predecessor to VS Code”. Whereas Zed is quite small and fast. Opening a shell panel is instant and makes VS Code feel slow.
Its strength is multi-user (their term: multiplayer) shared editing spaces. It also has quite good AI integration and supports Github Copilot too.
I am a little concerned that they started off commercial and then went open source. Open source is great! But this path sometimes means that the original developers no longer have the time/money/interest to keep developing it. I hope that’s not the case here because they’ve got the start of something good.
moreeni@lemm.ee 9 months ago
Developing a proprietary code editor is a blunder. The big players in the space are Vim, Emacs and VSCode, all of which are open source, so you can’t outcompete those unless you go open source yourself. Being customisable and source-hackable is the key in making your product being liked by developers, obviously.
My bet is they simply realised the mistake and decided to fix it.
kinttach@lemm.ee 9 months ago
Is it a blunder? Tell that to Apple, Jetbrains, or Microsoft, each of whom have proprietary code editors that net billions of dollars of revenue.
It’s true, VS Code is open source, but it is developed almost entirely by Microsoft, by a large team of paid full-time programmers, designers, and PMs. It may be the most-used text editor in the world, but it isn’t developed by a team of volunteers who materialized around it because it was open source.
Instead, consider that making something open source is often just a marketing strategy — or a soft way to sunset a project.
davawen@programming.dev 9 months ago
For the last point, they mentionned from the very start they wanted to go open source