Silicon Valley Battles States Over New Online Safety Laws for Children - The New York Times

Comments

• orbit@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Many groups have wanted an “online passport” for a long time now and it’s hard for me to not see this as another attempt veiled by “won’t someone think of the children”.

  Once this starts it’ll be required for everything.

  source
• Copernican@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I don’t see how these small state specific regulations can work. California is the only state big enough, and the EU as a whole does GDPR type regulations uniformly. Regardless of what they regulations are, I feel like it needs to be US federal level regulation to make compliance practical

  source

  • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Agreed that it’s more practical at a federal level, but good luck getting that to pass.

    Then again, lots of companies are incorporated in DE…

    source
• yildo@kbin.social ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Safety Laws for Children

  Papers Please Laws For Anyone To Access Any Website

  source
• autotldr@lemmings.world [bot] ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  This is the best summary I could come up with:

  ---

  But this month, just before the measure was to take effect, a tech industry group called NetChoice — which represents Google, Meta, Snap, TikTok and others — filed a lawsuit to block it on free speech grounds, persuading a Federal District Court judge to temporarily halt the new rules.

  Fueled by escalating public concerns over young people’s mental health, lawmakers and regulators across the United States are mounting bipartisan efforts to rein in popular social media platforms by enacting a wave of laws, even as tech industry groups work to overturn them.

  A first-of-its-kind law passed last spring in Utah would require social media companies to verify users’ ages and obtain parental consent before allowing minors to set up accounts.

  NetChoice has also filed a lawsuit to try to block the new social media bill in Utah that would require Instagram and TikTok to verify users’ ages and obtain parental permission for minors to have accounts.

  Civil rights groups have warned that such legislative efforts could stifle freedom of expression — by requiring adults, as well as minors, to verify their ages using documents like drivers’ licenses just to set up and use social media accounts.

  The Supreme Court has overturned a number of laws that aimed to protect minors from potentially harmful content, including violent video games and “indecent” online material, on free speech grounds.

  ---

  The original article contains 1,180 words, the summary contains 226 words. Saved 81%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  source