Testing Boosts on Meta

Comments

• awesomerobot@meta.discourse.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I imagine the name is meant to be sort of like “morale boost” you’re “gassing someone up” as it goes — this is essentially 1:1 with the basecamp flavor of reactions.

  Yes, will 100% be optional

  It likely varies significantly by site — there are cases where sites reduce the minimum post length which tends to create a situation where a lot of people end up replying with “cool” “love it” or whatever. Doing that with boosts allows for this sort of noise while occupying a little less of the discussion feed.

  nope

  It doesn’t bump the discussion, just sends the boosted user a notification that contains the boost content

  just as likely as any other text input — if you click a boost it reveals a flag icon (maybe making this hover on desktop makes it more discoverable?), so it can be flagged and addressed like moderators like posts

  source

  • Ed_S@meta.discourse.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Kind of interesting… but I have little to no idea of what basecamp is. I suspect a developer tool? Which is to say, “boost” mightn’t mean the same thing to everyone. In Discord it has a meaning, likewise as noted in Mastodon. To me, the name evokes an algorithmic adjustment - I really don’t want an algorithmic feed in Discourse.

    source
  • putty@meta.discourse.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Is the AI moderator able to detect toxicity in boosts and auto-flag?

    source
• Ed_S@meta.discourse.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  who is going to see the text, and when will they see it? is a person expected to keep revisiting every reply in a topic to see if any new boosts have turned up?

  what’s the chance of toxic content appearing in boosts? who will see, who will police?

  what’s the chance of a side-conversation happening within boosts?

  I very much hope this is optional: it doesn’t seem attractive to me for my forums.

  (And if it doesn’t chance the order or promotion of a reply, I think boost is a poor name. Quip seems better, but that’s possibly not a widely enough understood word.)

  source

  • Moin@meta.discourse.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    That’s an aspect I have thought about, too. Since no one else is notified, someone with bad intentions can be quite sure the user themselves will read the message, while a public reply bumping the topic might be flagged by someone else.

    I haven’t tested how muting a user interacts with boosts. If a user has already muted another user, it could either result in an unwanted notification because of the boost by the person they muted or no notification for anyone about the bad boost, so it might stay undiscovered by members who could flag it for a while.

    source
• Shauny@meta.discourse.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I like this but think it should be combined with Reactions, just let people add text to their reactions. Having another button is confusing, and the name is very confusing.

  source
• j.jaffeux@meta.discourse.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Boosts fill a gap in the interaction hierarchy:

  • posts
  • boosts
  • reactions
  • likes

  The idea is obviously not to have everything at once. Mid/Long term we will most likely unify boosts/reactions/likes so a community can decide to pick one of them depending on their requirements/size/kind/…

  I do agree that we should probably allow communities to have more flexibility on the max length.

  source
• Lilly@meta.discourse.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  i think i flagged a boost by accident by tapping on it

  source

  • Moin@meta.discourse.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Did that work for you? I got this modal telling me I cannot flag

    source
• Lilly@meta.discourse.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  i seriously don’t understand the point of this feature if we have reactions already. what am i missing here? what is the benefit of a boost vs like or reaction?

  is it akin to a mastodon boost and will it work with activity pub?

  source

  • putty@meta.discourse.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I’m teetering back and forth on whether this would be useful or not.

    On one hand I understand it helps limit contain a reply like I would’ve done to yours, which would’ve just been “unfortunately I agree”… Albiet the character limit hindered my full response. The way I see it is it is like a descriptive reaction that doesn’t clutter the topic. For example if I just hearted/liked your reply you have to somewhat assume an interpretation (I realize the solution may just be add more reaction options, though).

    One benefit that I could see it it’s another rung in the engagement ladder for people to interact more. My community is very introverted and reluctant to reply, so perhaps this reply-lite may entice them more.

    source
• Jagster@meta.discourse.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  How does a boost look to other users? Another bump, but a lite version?

  source
• Canapin@meta.discourse.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  image
  I don’t recognize this word, I assume boosts aren’t translated already :smile:

  Those are already rare as posts must have a minimum of X characters. The limit exists precisely to avoid this kind of replies. Discourse made things well in this respect, tho the default 20 characters is too high to my taste (I decreased it on all my forums).

  I remember “Quip” was also proposed amongst others suggestions. I liked this one for how the word sounds, but it was apparently not neutral enough. Indeed, names are hard to choose, and it’s also difficult to change them later.

  Yes, but with more than 15 characters.
  Pretty much anything under 15 characters to me would belong to a like or a reaction.
  Something more in the range of ~30 characters, perhaps, would fill the gap between a like and a small message we’d like to add without writing it in a full-featured post.

  It’s just my feeling after briefly testing this single topic, so it’ll probably change over time.

  And how boosts are used will probably differ a lot within different categories or forums.

  If the intent is to allow users to emphasize their reaction with one or two words, then it does the job. If the intent is to allow users to add a bit more information or subtlety as a quick note, then 15 chars is probably too short.

  Also, what about the possibility of allowing a boost only after liking or reacting?

  Anyway, very happy to see this feature live :slight_smile:
  It’s one of those many, small features that help Discourse stand out over contenders. :rocket:

  source

  • NateDhaliwal@meta.discourse.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    And it’s also in the name of the plugin at GitHub - discourse/discourse-boosts · GitHub. So yeah, not that easy to change.

    source
• Moin@meta.discourse.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  How does flagging boosts work? I accidentally clicked on the flag icon (on short boosts those are quite close to the avatar) and got this, where the flag button was disabled
  

  Screenshot_20260403_120027_Firefox

  Screenshot_20260403_120027_Firefox1177×400 75.5 KB

  source
• David_Ghost@meta.discourse.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I loved this. It’s great to see that it’s possible to add a message. This avoids those small posts that only say “thx nice share.”

  will posts with a boost change the order in the topic page?

  source

  • zogstrip@meta.discourse.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    That’s not planned. It’s just a reaction/emoji with a small text.

    source

    • bartv@meta.discourse.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I love the feature, but the name and icon are a bit misleading for me. Why is this called ‘boost’ if that’s not what it does?

      source

      • -> View More Comments