Company found guilty over New Zealand volcano disaster
Submitted 1 year ago by Demigodrick@lemmy.zip to globalnews@lemmy.zip
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-67270033
Submitted 1 year ago by Demigodrick@lemmy.zip to globalnews@lemmy.zip
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-67270033
_cnt0@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
My real takeaway from that article is this: Three men own a volcano. They inherited it. Let that sink in for a moment and think about how absurd it is.
antizero99@lemmynsfw.com 1 year ago
How is that absurd? It’s a landmass, people own land including entire islands. Inheriting a mass with a volcano on it doesn’t seem any different from inheriting a farm.
_cnt0@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Do you really see no qualitative difference between owning some land to live on or to produce food or something other useful, and owning a volcano just because? We can also have the discussion of private land ownership vs grant of use for a specific purpose. Or about the justification for inheritance. It’ll be a slippery slope into capitalism vs socialism. My gut feeling tells me that it wouldn’t be a productive discourse, that we should avoid.