Apple backs their version of personal repair where they still control who repairs what, who can sell or buy parts and at what price and continues to be completely anti-consumer to protect their massively profitable repair business.
Apple backs California Right to Repair Act after long fight
Submitted 1 year ago by Geert@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
https://www.theregister.com/2023/08/24/apple_california_right_repair/
Comments
WagesOf@artemis.camp 1 year ago
tabular@lemmy.world 1 year ago
When imposter is sus.
luthis@lemmy.nz 1 year ago
Very suspicious.
Khanzarate@lemmy.world 1 year ago
“It feels like the Berlin Wall of tech repair monopolies is starting to crumble, brick by brick.”
Feeling like that just screams how corrupt our government is. Apple shouldn’t get a vote, and their approval is the last thing that should be required to approve this.
Corporations should have to work in whatever environment consumer protection laws let them have, instead of dictating what protections we get.
Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 1 year ago
They don’t approve it, they’re just going to get their arse tickled by California, then absolutely fuckin reamed out by the EU if they don’t
dartos@reddthat.com 1 year ago
BuT coORPEratIOns arE PeOplE
Steeve@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
It’s a bit more complex than that unfortunately. Governments have not invested significantly in regulation, the people writing the regulation have almost no idea how the underlying tech works and as a result they have to lean on tech companies to help write the regulation that’s going to regulate them. It’s a weird line to walk, but if they don’t walk it they end up with regulation that just gets thrown out of courts every time they try to enforce it.
One recent example, a few months back the GDPR slapped Facebook with a $13B fine for the way they transfer user data from the EU to the US. It was all over Reddit, people were celebrating, but it’s going to be thrown out if it hasn’t been already. Why? Because there is currently no legal method of transferring user data from the EU to the US, and, like it or not, that’s critical for the operation of thousands of global companies.
The high level TLDR is that the EU courts invalidated the only legal way to transfer user data from the EU to the US, causing a conflict in US and EU data transfer laws. Companies started using a different method, which was agreed to be allowed until the EU and US came to an agreement on how data is legally transferred. This was in the works when the Irish DPC used the GDPR to throw a $13B fine at Facebook for using the only data transfer method available to them, causing thousands of companies across the world (including mine lol) to collectively shit their pants.
When this shit happens once, whatever, but when tech regulation starts getting laughed out of court regularly we’ve got a bigger problem on our hands.