I Went All-In on AI. The MIT Study Is Right.

Comments

• jaykrown@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I needed to make a small change and realized I wasn’t confident I could do it.

  Wouldn’t the point be to use AI to make the change, if you’re trying to do it 100% with AI? Who is really saying 100% AI adoption is a good idea though? All I hear about from everyone is how it’s not a good idea, just like this post.

  source
• PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Wasn’t this obvious? He didn’t need to go “all-in on ai” cause there is hundreds of thousands of people who tried the same thing already and everyone of them could tell him that’s not what ai can do.

  source

  • SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Hundreds of thousands of internet strangers is differently from lived experience.

    I take the author’s opinion more seriously because they went out and tried it for themselves.

    source

    • snooggums@piefed.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      “Thousands of people said touching a hot stove hurts. He touched the stove to try it himself, and I respect him for burning himself instead of using shared human knowlesge.”

      source
• lorski@sopuli.xyz ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  This is spot on.

  source
• dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  and in order for ai to do that, it has to employ strategy and resource management. Good luck

  source