Lemmy is popular nowadays, yet is losing its active users

Comments

• pyromaniac_donkey@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  ayt

  source
• Renacles@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Those are pretty good numbers

  source
• zoe@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  quality over quantity: trash users can find their way out

  source
• Flex@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I’m very interested to see where it settles. It should give in indication of what percentage of people are able/willing to use lemmy in it’s current state.

  The fediverse is such a cool project but it can be pretty rough from a usability standpoint.

  source
• pyromaniac_donkey@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  OP btfo

  source
• jedi_hamster@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I will use Lemmy more when Sync will fix hiding posts. And no, I’m not gonna use “remove read”

  source
• xikufrancesc@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  ¿Se consideran como activos los que solo entran para leer y votar? Pues no comentan pero rien y no paran de reir. No hay que fiarse tanto de los números sino mas bien de la naturalidad, neutralidad y originalidad de respuestas.

  Are those who only enter to read and vote considered as assets? Well, they don’t comment but laugh and they don’t stop laughing. You should not trust the numbers so much but rather the naturalness, neutrality and originality of responses.

  source
• callinean@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Average mass is too mid to come out of their “none is here” mindset for most superior alternatives.

  source
• waterbogan@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Some of those will be bots or trolls or just shitheads in general so no great loss

  source
• Brkdncr@artemis.camp ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Can someone normalize facebooks active use chart over the same time range?

  source
• magic_lobster_party@kbin.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Still a massive increase compared to a few months ago.

  source