US court rules Reddit doesn’t need to identify users who pirate movies

Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨L4s@lemmy.world [bot]⁩ to ⁨technology@lemmy.world⁩

https://www.standard.co.uk/tech/us-court-ruling-reddit-identify-users-pirate-movies-b1098279.html

US court rules Reddit doesn’t need to identify users who pirate movies::In future, we could see more cases where Hollywood goes after individual internet service providers and websites to detect online pirates

source

Comments

Sort:hotnew top

DoubleOwl7777@feddit.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

hollywood and streaming providers can all collectively fuck themselves. they make it more and more idiotic to do so legally and then wonder why people pirate.

source
- Gearheart@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  I mean they want to pirate people and expect everyone else to be okay with it.
  
  source
o_oli@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
All the more reason to use a vpn even for casual browsing I guess. Never know when someone wants to overstep and turn the most trivial thing against you. Even if this is the case now that its been denied, what’s to stop this happening elsewhere or at another time? The fact it’s been tried once means it will be tried again. No thanks to that.

source
- Tandybaum@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  I have to think that even if something went to court there is 0 connection to me saying “I pirated xyz” and being able to connect that to real life.
  
  Nothing that is said on Reddit or Lemmy is sworn on a bible true true true.
  
  source
  - Achird@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    It may not be “sworn on a bible true true true” but it could be used to help build up evidence along with other sources or identify people to target for further investigation.
    
    Absolutely shouldn’t be enough on it’s own to be able to get warrants or forces companies like Reddit to give out private information… but there’s be a line somewhere between “someone said they downloaded a movie” and “someone has admitted to committing or planning a horrible violent crime” where law enforcement would be justified in getting warrants. It should follow strict oversight and justification like warrants for “real life” things (I say “should” as in the moral should… no idea how good US laws are around this stuff or how well they are followed”)
    
    source
djmarcone@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
If reddit doesn’t have to then why would an ISP?

This is precedent setting.

source
SkinList@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
source