Proton claiming shit that they don’t actually do or can do?
Consider me shocked!
Submitted 3 weeks ago by XLE@piefed.social to technology@lemmy.world
https://osai-index.eu/news/lumo-proton-least-open
Proton claiming shit that they don’t actually do or can do?
Consider me shocked!
They didn’t try very hard to find the source code.
In the 1 September update they state they found that web client and a mobile client as well, but not the API (I guess) containing the system prompt and the actual routing to the models.
This article makes no sense in supporting the thesis.
It supports the thesis that Lumo is not open source in many common sense ways that most people would expect when a model claims it is open source. So in that sense, it does though.
Can you be more specific?
How so? It’s pretty clear that Proton using “open source” in context of their LLM service is demonstrated to be false.
It supports the thesis that Lumo is not open source in many common sense ways that most people would expect when a model claims it is open source. So in that sense, it does though.
UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
TLDR: Apps are open, models are open weight but you don’t know which one you get, and they have not yet disclosed any tweaks they may have made (although for me, it never sounded like they actually tweak the models all too much)
XLE@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
Your tl;dr appears to be missing some important data. You can have an opinion but please don't represent it as an accurate summary.
Things you crucially missed:
fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 3 weeks ago
It get worse, and the model weights is a bit inaccurate with the Sept update:
So if the server isn’t open source, and the server does all the work, this system is simply not Open Source.