I’m talking like communities exclusive to an instance where only instance members can participate in. This would be great for communities like The Agora.
Yes, we have that in PeerTube already and it’s awesome for private communities like a school, a company, a extended family, etc. where you want to be able to share some stuff mostly with this inner circle.
On my PeerTube instance 90% of the videos are only for internal use of my extended family and friends because we post videos of our Children there which we don’t want to post on the open internet but still want to have the convinience of all the metadata with thumbnails, tags, search, subscribtions, etc.
Little8Lost@feddit.de 1 year ago
not really, it would make some content very centralised which feels like against the idea of the fediverse.
But there could be some use cases like status reports of server but i dont really think it bothers people on other servers to see it.
Maybe for some chats of the server with the admins it could be useful but there i feel the matrix/mastodon/email option they offer is for that use case better, for the drawback of the need to change the platform.
I know that my POV is very negative about your idea so i would be happy about everyone arguing against me.
KyRoLen@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
What if it’s read only access instead?
PupBiru@kbin.social 1 year ago
kinda makes a very “us vs them” mentality though… seems like it could easily lead to people being required to have accounts on big instances, or ad supported instances having “premium content” or something like that: basically everything we want to avoid
med@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Local participation communities could still be perfectly visible to other instances. I don’t see many downsides.
The only question is, is there a point? Anyone can sign up and post, it’d just be a kind of rate-limiter for remote instances that don’t police their own sign-ups well