Damm it’s kinda bad that there is a logical justification for calling it a retouch instead of remaster and that this argument shits on so many large game companies
Dying Light continues celebrating its 10th anniversary with a big graphical facelift, but don't you dare call it a remaster
Submitted 20 hours ago by ninelife@lemmy.ca to games@lemmy.world
Comments
Deathray5@lemmynsfw.com 19 hours ago
Meruten@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 hours ago
Are they going to patch the ps4 version to not run at 1080p 30fps with thick motion blur on the ps5?
It doesn’t look it like, but they’re still charging £25 for over on PSN.
VirgilMastercard@reddthat.com 18 hours ago
moncharleskey@lemmy.zip 17 hours ago
Personally I wouldn’t say the 2nd was terrible. The first was a better game, but it was helped significantly by free post release updates, which DL2 has gotten a lot of a well. I was pretty impressed with the depth of the city and I like the slow infection aspect. I really miss having a vehicle, but if I remember correctly, there wasn’t a vehicle in the first one at launch and it was added later. Just my 2 cents.
GreyCat@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
It wasn’t utter shit, or even bad. It just doesn’t hook you like the first one does.