Why is crap from 2 weeks ago being posted like it’s new news yet again
Is this one of those bot accounts that aren’t marked properly or is OP just after karma (which doesn’t exist on this site).
Submitted 1 year ago by seasonone@opidea.xyz to technology@lemmy.world
Why is crap from 2 weeks ago being posted like it’s new news yet again
Is this one of those bot accounts that aren’t marked properly or is OP just after karma (which doesn’t exist on this site).
I’m conflicted on a lot of this. At the end of the day it seems like these LLMs are simulating human behavior to an extent - exposure to content and generating similar content from that. Could Sarah Silverman be sued by comedians who influenced her comedy style and routines? generally no. I do understand the risk with letting these ‘AI’ run rampant to displace a huge portion of the creative space which is bad but where should the line be drawn? Is it only the fact they were trained material they dont own people are challenging? What recourse will they have when a LLM is trained on wholly owned IP?
I hope she loses.
No one should “own” words or concepts.
Then why are we banned from using certain words on social media?
That’s a completely unrelated topic.
You’re talking about censorship, I’m talking about ownership.
Just because you can freely say something doesn’t mean I have to forced to listen to it.
I'm still waiting on proof for any of these allegations. So far it's just been people suing for the sake of suing and hoping they strike gold. If anyone can point to any evidence at all (read: not hearsay) then I'll gladly review it, but as it stands, its nothing.
none of them are funny or outrageous so I doubt she was highly cited
I don’t like Sarah Silverman.
LexiconDexicon@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I hope she wins