[ comments | sourced from HackerNews ]
[HN] Meta’s LLaMa 2 license is not Open Source
Submitted 1 year ago by irradiated@radiation.party [bot] to technews@radiation.party
Submitted 1 year ago by irradiated@radiation.party [bot] to technews@radiation.party
[ comments | sourced from HackerNews ]
noorbeast@lemmy.zip 1 year ago
“Misunderstanding” seems to me an incredibly polite and dignified way to say deliberately mislead, given open source licensing and underlying principles have been around since before Meta existed.