I still prefer thinking of Deckard as not being a replicant but…
spoiler
…there was a bit in the book where Deckard was questioning if he himself was an android. ___
I see it as a Lady or the Tiger situation. In fiction we generally expect the rules to come out ( magic A = magic A ) and then be consistently followed. But Dick is notorious for subverting or applying recursion to the same reality-altering notion.
We’ve seen this happen in other Dick stories. In impostor for example, Spence Olham is triggered by realizing he is not human.
If Deckard is a replicant it is possible he’s not aware of his inhuman status and that neither are his fellow officers. Even Rachael brought up the point that the hunters are not expected to get tested, themselves.
nyahlathotep@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
In my opinion the whole “Deckard’s actually a replicant” thing ruins an important part of the movie: the juxtaposition of Roy as a machine that’s a man vs Deckard who is a man that’s a machine. Deckard unquestioningly hunts and murders replicants without remorse, robotically going through the motions, at least until he gets to know a pretty one. Roy murders people in a passionate, angry way, but in the end decides to grant mercy to Deckard, someone he should hate. This act of mercy breaks through Deckard’s shell, and restores his humanity to him. If Deckard was a replicant the whole time, it ruins his character arc imo.
Jilanico@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Totally agree. And from a plot hole perspective, why would the police allow a replicant to quit the force and just live his life eating noodles, as we saw in the beginning of the movie?
Also turns out the revision to make him a replicant was to set up a sequel: youtu.be/53Qr4U7__lQ&t=17m35s