How about during the signup process(step) the user gets instance allocated randomly?

Submitted ⁨⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨parrot@lemm.ee⁩ to ⁨fediverse@lemmy.world⁩

The biggest F U you get while signing up on lemmy is choosing a instance and I know this process acts as a filter in itself, clearing the randoms and normies. But if lemmy instance is assigned randomly, it is like hitting two birds with one stone. it solves discouragement you get when signing up but also distributes the load on different servers. the only downside I see with this is if the instance is closed.

source

Comments

Sort:hotnew top

Blaze@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Good luck to them if they are randomly assigned to hexbear or lemmygrad

source
- Berin@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Yeah, the biggest problem with this approach is different moderation philosophies. You would have to set up a vetted set of approved non-problematic instances. I’ve read several accounts of people who tried out fedi and left soon after, and nothing sours the newcomer experience more than unknowingly joining an instance with a toxic community/moderators
  
  source
  - threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    
    You would have to set up a vetted set of approved non-problematic instances.
    
    No instance will be perfect, but I think lemm.ee, lemmy.zip, and lemmy.sdf.org could be good candidates for generic instances to recommend. All in the top 20 instances, so they are decently well federated, but not centralizing to the largest instance (LemmyWorld).
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
- parrot@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  I hear that, but wouldnt that also prevent echo chambers
  
  source
  - Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    Not if the admins of an instance want to maintain their echo chamber by shepherding discussions towards extremist viewpoints.
    
    source
rglullis@communick.news ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Again… Are you people ignoring my work on purpose?

Sign up to fediverser.network

select "Find an instance"

answer simple questions (interests, languages)

get an instance recommendation

I know that the UX needs to improve, but it’s super frustrating to see people talking about things like they are a completely novel concept.
source
- cron@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  I’m on lemmy a lot, but have not seen your site yet. But I’m hesitant to register for a site to find out where to register.
  
  Also, you seem to have a list of servers, where I was able to suggest one country. feddit.org serves the german-speaking fediverse, and that is at least four countries (if you count Liechtenstein).
  
  source
  - rglullis@communick.news ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    The site is meant to be a crowdsourced database. You can go to fediverser.network/instances/feddit.org and add the countries.
    
    source
- Krafting@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  It’s not ignoring if we don’t know it even exists!
  
  source
Vittelius@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
There is another downside. The local and global feeds are potent discovery tools. But they only work if you group people with similar interests onto the same instance. Your proposal assumes a certain amount of homogeneity. If everyone is interested in the same content anyway then yes you can distribute it randomly. But all the people interested in Linux memes are already here. If we are to expand our reach we need to have instances catering to other interests.

And it also doesn’t work with international communities. German speakers for example go to feddit.org, precisely because that’s where German content is going to be amplified via the local feed and therefore easier to discover (for people an that particular instance)

source
cron@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Most users that are not from the english-speaking world can just join one of the few servers in their language:

german: 2 servers

spanish: 2 servers

portoguese: 2 servers

italian: 1 server

polish: 1 server

Source: join-lemmy.org
source
- Blaze@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  The list of communities by country is in the sidebar of !yurop@lemm.ee
  
  source
SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

I know this process acts as a filter in itself, clearing the randoms and normies.

This could be retained by having instances opt into/out of random allocation of new users.

source
abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Instead of having it be completely random, I am thinking of a site similar to sub.rehab.

Instances that are open to public signup would register on the site, and give updated states on how many users they have along with a brief description of what they are for.

Users can decide roughly what size instance they'd like to join and view a list of matches. We could add a "I'm Feeling Lucky" button that picks a random one out from the list.

source