Ask ChatGPT and Claude the same thing and you get two confident answers that mostly agree, worded differently. You end up comparing tone, not substance. What works better for me is giving the second one the first one’s answer and a specific job: “Another AI answered this question: [question] Its answer: [paste] Don’t rewrite it. Tell me: Which claims you’d stand behind and which you wouldn’t, and why Anything it left out that would change the answer for someone in my situation Where you’d answer differently If you’d stand behind all of it, say that in one line.” The last line matters. Without it you get a list of nitpicks every time, because the model assumes it was asked to find problems. With it, a short “this is fine” becomes believable, and the times it does push back are worth reading. It works in either direction. Gemini grading ChatGPT, Claude grading Gemini, whatever you have open. I keep it saved with blanks for the question and the answer. I build AI Toolbox, an extension for ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok, and typing // in any of them pulls the prompt up and asks for the two blanks. Two saved prompts are free; having the same prompts on all four assistants is Premium. preview.redd.it/h9l1b3g6gmwh1.png?width=1456&form… Which pair disagrees with each other most for you? submitted by /u/Ok_Negotiation_2587
Originally posted by u/Ok_Negotiation_2587 on r/ArtificialInteligence