Comment on “Should art be regulated by the SEC?” NFT artists file lawsuit

• ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Nope.

  This is why anyone not huffing paintbhas stayed far away from NFTs.

  source
• AlotOfReading@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  No, the “non-fungibility” simply means that anyone who creates an NFT with the same link will be distinct from your link to the image, even if the actual URL is the same. Both NFTs can also be traced back to when they were created/minted because they’re on a blockchain, a property called provenance. If the authentic tokens came from a well known minting, you can establish that your token is “authentic” and the copy token is a recreation, even if the actual link (or other content) is completely identical.

  Nothing about having the “authentic” token would give you actual legal rights though.

  source

  • FiskFisk33@startrek.website ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    yeah, I understand the tech far better than I understand the law. I thought they legally counted as a contract, i guess they’fe not even that.

    source

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      For a contract transferring property, you need 2 parties: One offering and the other accepting. Having knowledge of a cryptographic key implies none of that.

      You could get something like this done by transferring the asset to a reputable trustee. The trustee - a law firm, bank, or such - checks that the paperwork is in order and it has the necessary rights. It binds itself contractually to convey some benefit - eg a revocable copyright license - to whoever can show that they have a certain cryptographic key/control of a wallet.

      The firm should regularly check if the beneficiary still holds the key. It might get lost or forgotten, after all. The possibility of losing access to the asset by theft or accident is the only thing that involving NFTs add to such a scheme, so one might as well lean into it.

      source

      • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Be a shame if I traded my stupid collection of URLs around and eventually bought them back only to lose the key, better get insurance in case I forget it.

        source
• vithigar@lemmy.ca ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  At best you’re buying into a collective agreement of ownership among those also participating in the NFT ecosystem. You own a thing because a large enough group of people agree you own it and respect the authority of that token.

  At worst you’ve been scammed and are trying to convince yourself the above is true and that said “large enough group” includes anyone at all capable of enforcing said ownership. Spoilers: it does not.

  source
• sugartits@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  [deleted]

  source

  • sugartits@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Why did a moderator remove my comment?

    Do you want this place to die? Because excessive moderation is how this place dies.

    source
  • FiskFisk33@startrek.website ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I thought you at least had the rights to it, wow.

    source