Comment on Israeli planes strike Hezbollah targets in Lebanon
BrikoX@lemmy.zip 3 weeks agoThis fake narrative that everything Israel does is self-defese is getting old. You can’t claim self-defese if you make the first strike. Imagine trying to explain to the cops that you killed the intruder 500 km from your home in self-defense… That’s basically your idiotic argument.
It described the barrage as a response to the assassination of senior military commander Fuad Shukr, who was killed in an Israeli strike in Beirut on 30 July.
Assassination doesn’t sound very self-defensive…
i_hate_nazis@eviltoast.org 3 weeks ago
www.cnn.com/world/live-news/…/index.html
www.bbc.com/news/articles/cv2gj544x65o
timesofisrael.com/11-killed-mostly-children-dozen…
www.bbc.com/news/articles/c29dydz84ngo
Its absolutely justified to kill the head of a terrorist organization, it causes chaos and gives the bottom line (many child soldiers especially in case of hezbolla, www.dw.com/en/…/a-49606125) a chance to flee and live their lifes, hezbolla has been firing rockets into Israel for years and after 7. Oktober it where thousands within a few days. Your narrative is quite literally what their propaganda is, that is however absolutely not the truth.
And no, to pick up your analogy, its like killing a organized crime boss that commands his gang of kids to drive-by on your house from time to time because you have another religion/ethnicity.
BrikoX@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Nowhere did I said it’s not morally justified. I said it’s not self-defense. And it’s not.
And you seem to be keen to pretend that Hezbollah is the only party here firing the rockets. Israel fired rockets into Lebanon for years too and murdered a lot of civilians. Killing fighters be it IDF, Hamas or Hezbollah is one thing, killing civilians is another. If you can somehow justify to yourself killing children, you are a monster.
i_hate_nazis@eviltoast.org 3 weeks ago
You should inform yourself about them, here is one article for you, there are many more. biznews.com/…/debunking-al-jazeeras-coverage-wood…
The reuters link:
Literally counter batty fire.
The apnews is about a strike that killed 2 people driving a motorcycle, there is no reason given, but apparently it was a security guard apparently, idk about the reasoning.
So… Do you even read your linked articles?
In the exchanges of fire (started on 7th. October)
Whats your point? Israel killes the people shooting rockets into Cities being bad? Shure there is collateral damage, but its a war, you cannot always pinpoint every strike and make shure that there is no civilian. Especially not in a asymmetrical war.
Oh and again, the “children” argument. Yeah no shit people die in war and as i stated earlier, hezbolla uses child soldiers just like hamas. What is your point?
BrikoX@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Their coverage is biased, but it’s factual. And the fact that you dismiss it just shows your own ignorance.
Your garbage article is probably the worst piece of writing I read this year.