Yes, it is, because it does the job. Why exactly shouldn’t they?
Comment on OpenBSD has reached OpenBSD of Theseus
waigl@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Is OpenBSD seriously still using CVS for development?
tux0r@feddit.org 2 months ago
chellomere@lemmy.world 2 months ago
For example, maybe branching is something you’d like to be able to do without it being a nightmare?
tux0r@feddit.org 2 months ago
OpenBSD seems to be able to have branches (CURRENT and STABLE), and they seem to be able to manage them just fine.
Jagger2097@lemmy.world 2 months ago
They can work on replacing that next
Fred@programming.dev 2 months ago
CVS is the authoritative repository of code, and they recommend to users to use that or reposync (built atop of CVS) to keep their system updated.
There is also a GitHub mirror , and got is an OpenBSD project, and I suspect a number of devs use one of those for local work until it’s time to push the changes to the authoritative tree.
gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Yeah, that’s weird. It’s pretty unorthodox to use a pharmacy chain for development.
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
To be fair, they have a pufferfish as a mascot, so there’s bound to be some need for pharmaceuticals.