Yes, both of those may already be servers
Comment on If "Master/Slave" terminology in computing sounds bad now, why not change it to "Dom/Sub"?
realitista@lemm.ee 4 weeks agoThe thing is that master has a different connotation in IT than server does. Such as in master/slave pairs for fault tolerance.
Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 4 weeks ago
holgersson@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
Fair enough. Im in devops and the first thing I thought about was Jenkins, where “server” and “agent” fit quite well.
I dont think master/slave is that good of a naming scheme for fault tolerance either, since the “slave” doesnt do work so that the master doesnt have to, but it’s rather an active/reserve kind of thing.
But I also admit that using different terms that fit best for every usecase would only cause more confusion than good.
realitista@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
I agree that active/reserve is a better way of saying it, and that’s the way I’ve always said it when working with these systems. Honestly I may have never heard master slave in actual use in 15 years of regularly describing such systems.